UNI (UNI) Price, Analysis, Predictions, and Calculator

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a crypto whale associated with address 0x44C made significant transactions on Binance within the last 24 hours. The whale deposited 4.3M USDT and subsequently withdrew 9.14M FET (approximately $2.33M) and 462K UNI (approximately $1.72M). These activities could indicate strategic trading or portfolio rebalancing by the entity.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a newly created wallet withdrew multiple tokens worth millions of dollars from Binance, including $ENA, $AAVE, $AVAX, $ONDO, $UNI, and $PENDLE. Following the withdrawals, the assets were transferred to two separate wallets, raising questions about potential trading strategies or fund movements.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a whale wallet, potentially linked to Monetalis, transferred 325,000 UNI (approximately $1.24 million) to Wintermute. The wallet still holds substantial assets, including 3.27 million UNI (~$12.75 million), 31,337 ETH (~$63.81 million), and 98,900 AAVE (~$11.86 million). This movement highlights significant trading activity and potential repositioning within the crypto market.

According to @thedaoofwei, BlackRock has made significant moves in the DeFi space by listing its $1.8 billion Treasury token on Uniswap, a major decentralized exchange. Additionally, the investment giant has purchased UNI governance tokens, signaling its growing interest in decentralized finance and blockchain-based governance.

According to Altcoin Daily, BlackRock has acquired Uniswap (UNI) tokens and is now offering decentralized finance (DeFi) trading services for the first time. This move signals a significant step by the asset management giant into the DeFi space, potentially boosting Uniswap's adoption and liquidity. Traders are expected to monitor the impact of this development on UNI's market activity and broader DeFi trends.

According to @lookonchain, following BlackRock's announcement to purchase UNI, trader 0x46bc swiftly opened a 10x leveraged long position on 1.21M UNI tokens, valued at $4.81M. The trader's entry price was $3.7027, and the position now shows an unrealized profit of $350.6K. This demonstrates the rapid market impact of institutional moves on cryptocurrency trading strategies.

According to @EmberCN, a long-term holder who bought at UNI listing fully exited 2.493 million UNI for about USD 10.62 million, realizing roughly USD 1.72 million profit or 19 percent after five years, source: @EmberCN. The same whale or institution previously closed 101,000 ETH at an average USD 3,313 for about USD 334 million with roughly USD 269 million profit, source: @EmberCN. The UNI position was closed about three hours before the post after being held for five years, source: @EmberCN.

According to @justinsuntron, JustLend announced a buyback and burn of 525 million JST, equal to about 5.25% of total supply and approximately $21 million, bringing cumulative burns to roughly 10.75%. Source: @justinsuntron, X, Jan 15, 2026. The post states that all protocol revenue will be used for multiple JST repurchases before Oct 1, 2025, with all purchased tokens destroyed, and that after this date each quarter’s net new revenue will be used to repurchase in the following quarter with all repurchased JST burned. Source: @justinsuntron, X, Jan 15, 2026. The comparison cited in the post notes UNI’s mechanism reportedly auto-buys and burns about one-quarter to one-sixth of V2 and V3 LP fees, implying a smaller share of protocol revenue is destroyed versus JST’s full-revenue approach. Source: @justinsuntron, X, Jan 15, 2026. The post also states AAVE targets around $50 million annually (about $4.2 million monthly) for buybacks, roughly one-third of monthly protocol revenue, and allocates the tokens to treasury or reserves rather than burning them. Source: @justinsuntron, X, Jan 15, 2026. The post characterizes JST’s buyback-and-burn intensity as the strongest among DeFi lending protocols in this comparison. Source: @justinsuntron, X, Jan 15, 2026.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, about 1 hour ago Galaxy Digital withdrew 292,000 UNI (approximately $1.83M) from Binance and transferred 492,500 UNI (approximately $3.0M) to a CoinShares-labeled address 0xB6857192d4aD431842138ea324EcE085e3364174, as shown on intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xB6857192d4aD431842138ea324EcE085e3364174. Source: @OnchainDataNerd; intel.arkm.com. Traders can track subsequent balance and flow changes at the referenced address and monitor UNI exchange flows on Binance to gauge venue supply dynamics around UNI liquidity. Source: @OnchainDataNerd; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xB6857192d4aD431842138ea324EcE085e3364174.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address 0xaBA...D926F received 5,000,000 UNI (about $29.05 million) from the Uni Timelock contract roughly 10 hours ago, with no subsequent transfers or sales reported. On-chain records for 0xaBA...D926F confirm the inbound from the Uni Timelock and show no outgoing transactions at the time of writing, per Arkham Intelligence.

According to CoinMarketCap, Uniswap executed its UNIfication on-chain, redirecting fees to buy back and burn UNI and completing an additional 100M UNI burn, a change that directly reduces token supply via fee-funded burns (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026). Raydium launched Raydium Perps with 100+ markets powered by Orderly, expanding derivatives trading venues and market coverage for DeFi traders (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026). Lifinity is shutting down after four years, with users able to redeem xLFNTY and related NFTs for USDC as part of the wind-down process (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026).

According to @CoinMarketCap, Bitwise has filed with the U.S. SEC to launch 11 single-token, altcoin-focused strategy ETFs that would provide regulated exposure to Aave, Uniswap, Hyperliquid, Zcash, Bittensor and others; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025. The post identifies these as single-token strategy ETFs offering regulated exposure to individual assets named, including Aave AAVE, Uniswap UNI, Zcash ZEC, and Bittensor TAO; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025. No filing identifiers, proposed tickers, fees, timelines, or approval status were disclosed in the post; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3EBF linked to the Indexed Finance and Kyber Network exploiter resumed activity after a year of dormancy and dumped 226,961 UNI (~USD 1.36M), 33,215 LINK (~USD 410K), 845,806 CRV (~USD 328K), and 5.25 YFI (~USD 17.5K) on December 30, 2025. According to @lookonchain, the reported USD values sum to approximately USD 2.12M across these assets. Arkham Intelligence’s address page for 0x3EBFC212ab2CBb16cbFD52e220381a85fD75D665 corroborates the wallet attribution and recent on-chain activity.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Uniswap burned 100M UNI (about $627M), representing roughly 10% of the total supply, with an on-chain transaction link provided by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd The reported supply reduction is a material deflationary event that traders can factor into UNI supply-demand models, liquidity assumptions, and price discovery frameworks. source: @OnchainDataNerd Traders may monitor UNI spot liquidity, perpetual funding and basis, and Uniswap pool depth for volatility and slippage around the burn timing referenced by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd Execution note: confirm the burn’s on-chain timestamp via the transaction reference provided by the source before initiating momentum or mean-reversion strategies. source: @OnchainDataNerd

According to @ai_9684xtpa, 100 million UNI have been burned and UNI price has reclaimed $6, highlighting near-term strength following a reported supply reduction; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, an identified whale address 0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8 sold 662,605 UNI at $8.82 with an average entry of $5.99, realizing $1.875 million profit on that tranche; source: @ai_9684xtpa; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8. According to @ai_9684xtpa, cumulative realized gains across three UNI swing cycles since September 2020 total $23.415 million with a 100% win rate, and the whale exited five months ago rather than holding to present levels; source: @ai_9684xtpa; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8. According to @ai_9684xtpa, key reference levels mentioned include the $6 reclaim, prior distribution around $8.82, and a previous local high near $12, which traders can use as supply and resistance references in UNI swing strategies; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to Lookonchain, after Uniswap’s fee burn proposal was approved, the Uniswap treasury executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI valued at about 591 million dollars roughly 4 hours ago. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. On-chain data from the Uniswap treasury address 0x1a9C8182C09F50C8318d769245beA52c32BE35BC shows UNI being sent to a burn address, confirming the reported burn transaction. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Traders should track UNI spot liquidity, slippage on major Uniswap pools, and derivatives funding and open interest for immediate market response to the burn event. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Further monitoring of the treasury address and governance implementation activity can help identify any follow-on transfers related to the fee burn rollout. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @OnchainLens, Uniswap's treasury executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI valued at approximately 594 million dollars, confirmed by transaction 0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e, source: Onchain Lens tweet https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2005077451333079113; Etherscan https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e. The action follows a fee burning proposal that passed two days earlier, and traders can verify the supply-side burn on-chain to update UNI supply and treasury-balance trackers for positioning decisions, source: Onchain Lens tweet https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2005077451333079113; Etherscan https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e.

According to @EmberCN, Uniswap executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI (about $596 million) from the Uniswap treasury at around 04:30 today, confirmed by Etherscan transaction 0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511; https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e The author adds that the fee-burn proposal passed two days earlier and that future Uniswap protocol fees will be used to burn UNI, establishing an ongoing supply-reduction mechanism. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511 Based on the UNI contract showing a total supply of 1,000,000,000, the burn equals roughly 10 percent of supply, a material tokenomics change traders can factor into liquidity and valuation models. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1f9840a85d5aF5bf1D1762F925BDADdC4201F984 Traders can monitor subsequent burns and fee accruals via the on-chain burn transactions and Uniswap analytics to gauge the pace of supply contraction and DEX revenue trends. Source: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e; https://info.uniswap.org

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap's UNIfication proposal to turn on the protocol's fee switch and burn 100 million UNI was approved on Thursday, with 125.3 million UNI voting in favor and only 742 UNI against. According to @CoinMarketCap, the vote outcome indicates overwhelming DAO support for enabling the protocol fee mechanism and executing a 100 million UNI burn, key parameters that directly affect token supply and protocol fee policy.

According to @MikeSilagadze, 2026 will be dominated by a revenue and fundamentals meta, with tokens that have sensible value accrual massively outperforming source: https://twitter.com/MikeSilagadze/status/2004307828249710804. He highlighted Hayden Adams’ update that Uniswap’s Unification vote concluded with 125,342,017 YES and 742 NO source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475. Per Adams, after an approximately two-day timelock, 100 million UNI will be burned, protocol fee switches will be flipped on, and Uniswap Labs will turn off frontend fees to focus on the protocol source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222 withdrew 2,179,487 UNI (~$12.68M) from Coinbase in the last 6 hours, lifting total holdings to 3.629M UNI (~$20.02M) with an average withdrawal price of $5.51 and an unrealized profit of about $0.74M; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222. According to @ai_9684xtpa, from Dec 15–23 the wallet cumulatively withdrew 1,682,220 UNI (~$8.75M) at an average price of $5.20; the Unification proposal was submitted for final governance vote on Dec 18 and passed on Dec 22, during which UNI reached a high of $6.5; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the activity may be Coinbase internal wallet consolidation rather than external accumulation, which would change the interpretation of these flows; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222 accumulated 1,682,220 UNI between Dec 15–23 by withdrawing from Coinbase, worth about 8.75 million dollars at an average cost of 5.2 dollars per token (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Arkham Intel explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the Unification proposal entered its final governance vote on Dec 18 and passed on Dec 22, during which UNI peaked at 6.5 dollars (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the position shows about 1.37 million dollars in unrealized profit based on the reported accumulation and price action (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intel, trading-relevant reference points are the 5.2 dollar cost basis, the 6.5 dollar swing high, and the observed Coinbase outflows tied to the address, which frame potential liquidity and supply dynamics for UNI in the near term (sources: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intel explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222).

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap’s protocol fee switch is expected to turn on this week after the UNIfication proposal reached quorum with virtually no opposition, marking one of the largest upgrades in the DEX’s seven-year history (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025). This defined activation window creates a near-term governance and fee-structure catalyst for UNI and Uniswap liquidity pools, with traders focused on the switch timing highlighted for this week (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025). The near-unanimous quorum reduces immediate governance uncertainty around the upgrade path, sharpening event-driven positioning for UNI (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, over the past 48 hours Vitalik Buterin sold UNI, ZORA, BNB, KNC, OMG and other meme tokens from his wallet as observed on-chain; source: @OnchainLens. Following these disposals, the wallet transferred $564,672 USDC and 27 ETH (about $80,364) via the RAILGUN Project; source: @OnchainLens, Nansen profiler. The referenced Nansen profiler page lists the sales and subsequent transfers, confirming timing, assets, and amounts for traders tracking whale activity; source: Nansen profiler.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, new wallet 0xDE2b2f5D55EcC64d7D3A55D4FC7247041b9E4613 withdrew a $17.8 million basket from Binance two hours ago comprising ETH, LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP, with ETH accounting for 95% or $16.93 million at a withdrawal price of $2,935.55, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet address is listed on the Arkham Intelligence explorer for verification of holdings and further on-chain tracking, source: Arkham Intelligence explorer. A small test transfer was executed yesterday before the larger withdrawal, indicating staged movement of funds, source: @ai_9684xtpa. With 95% of the position in ETH, the wallet’s exposure is predominantly tied to ETH price moves from the noted entry level, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew assets from Binance that include 5,770 ETH valued at USD 16.92 million, 9,870 LINK valued at USD 125.59 thousand, 140.62 AAVE valued at USD 26.03 thousand, 1,950 UNI valued at USD 9.9 thousand, 75,450 POL valued at USD 8.44 thousand, and 9.99 COMP valued at USD 270, with data sourced from Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, these figures total about USD 17.1 million and are dominated by ETH at roughly 99 percent of the withdrawn value, based on the same Nansen dataset. According to Glassnode research, net withdrawals from exchanges reduce on-exchange balances and can tighten immediate sell-side liquidity for the withdrawn assets, a dynamic traders monitor during large outflows; this context is relevant to the ETH-heavy nature of the flow reported by @OnchainLens using Nansen data.

According to @EmberCN, a16zcrypto transferred 276,000 COMP worth about $7.6 million to Coinbase Prime roughly two hours prior, indicating a venue-side move of inventory (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, a16z led Compound’s round and received 1,000,000 COMP in March 2020, equal to 10% of COMP’s total supply (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, a16z’s labeled on-chain wallets now mainly hold 64 million UNI (~$325 million) and 19.51 million OP (~$5.71 million) and no longer hold COMP (source: @EmberCN). Coinbase Prime is Coinbase’s institutional trading and custody platform where deposited assets can be executed via exchange and OTC services, making the transferred COMP tradable on venue infrastructure if orders are placed (source: Coinbase Prime, Coinbase). For trading, watch COMP spot volumes and Coinbase-related order flow given the wallet-to-exchange movement, and track UNI and OP on-chain and venue flows in light of the updated a16z allocations (sources: @EmberCN; Coinbase Prime).

According to @OnchainLens, Blockchain Capital withdrew 1.13M UNI worth approximately $6.48M from Bybit, Binance, and OKX over the last 6 hours (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The receiving wallet now holds 1.92M UNI valued around $10.88M at the time of reporting (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The figures imply an average reference value of about $5.73 per UNI for the withdrawn amount, based on the values provided by the source (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The address cited is 0xb5E4d21240e9356caFc3a1261d10383f62DFc24e, which the source attributes to Blockchain Capital activity (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xb5E4 withdrew 823,368 UNI (about $4.72M) from Binance and Bybit in the past 5 hours and now holds 1.61M UNI (about $9.1M), with the holdings and transfers viewable via Arkham Intelligence’s address explorer. According to @lookonchain, these transactions are framed as institutional accumulation of UNI, and the cited Arkham Intelligence page is provided as the on-chain source for verification.

According to @lookonchain, whale 0xBC64 bought another ~$13.9M across 10 assets during the dip and moved them on-chain to wallet 0xBC64, including ENA $5.92M (22.7M), ETH $5.79M (1,898), LINK $527K (38,614), UNI $413K (74,217), PENDLE $323K, CRV $295K, ONDO $242K, ENS $141K, AAVE $140K, and AERO $98K (source: @lookonchain on X). According to @lookonchain, the same wallet previously accumulated ~$35.7M across 8 assets and transferred them on-chain, led by ETH $10.13M (3,175), LINK $7.99M (557,937), ENA $5.82M (20.14M), AAVE $4.9M (25,396), ONDO $3.27M (6.53M), UNI $2.05M (340,849), SKY $1.09M (22.59M), and LDO $244K (384,075) (source: @lookonchain on X; wallet: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xBC64BDE4C3b70147C47c16dD9277a6Aaef7e0f02). According to @lookonchain, based on these reported amounts the cumulative purchases total ~$49.6M with the largest exposures now ETH ~$15.92M (32.2%), ENA ~$11.74M (23.6%), LINK ~$8.52M (17.2%), AAVE ~$5.04M (10.2%), ONDO ~$3.51M (7.1%), and UNI ~$2.46M (5.0%), with smaller positions in SKY, PENDLE, CRV, LDO, ENS, and AERO held at 0xBC64 (source: @lookonchain on X; on-chain wallet verified via ARKM explorer).

According to @lookonchain, a single whale bought 3,175 ETH ($10.13M), 557,937 LINK ($7.99M), 20.14M ENA ($5.82M), 25,396 AAVE ($4.9M), 6.53M ONDO ($3.27M), 340,849 UNI ($2.05M), 22.59M SKY ($1.09M), and 384,075 LDO ($244K), totaling $35.7M during the market dip (source: @lookonchain on X, Dec 4, 2025). According to @lookonchain, these assets have been moved on-chain to wallet 0xBC64BDE4C3b70147C47c16dD9277a6Aaef7e0f02 (source: @lookonchain on X; ARKM Intel explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xBC64BDE4C3b70147C47c16dD9277a6Aaef7e0f02). According to the source, traders can monitor address 0xBC64BDE4C3b70147C47c16dD9277a6Aaef7e0f02 for subsequent transfers across ETH, LINK, ENA, AAVE, ONDO, UNI, SKY, and LDO to track on-chain flows (source: ARKM Intel explorer link above).

According to @camillionaire_m, a post on Dec 3, 2025 flagged a “Major” Uniswap development and linked to an external post without disclosing specifics (source: @camillionaire_m). According to @camillionaire_m, the source did not provide any official statement from Uniswap’s verified channels or governance forums at the time of posting (source: @camillionaire_m). According to @camillionaire_m, with the nature of the update unspecified, traders should wait for confirmation from Uniswap’s official communications before taking UNI positions based solely on this signal (source: @camillionaire_m).

According to Matt Hougan, the current pullback is obscuring a key trend: tokens like UNI, ETH, and XRP are improving value capture, creating alpha opportunities as fundamentals link more directly to cash flows or supply burn, source: Matt Hougan on X. For UNI, Uniswap v3 includes a governance-controlled protocol fee that can redirect a portion of trading fees to the protocol, and a 2024 Uniswap Foundation proposal sought to distribute protocol revenues to stakers and delegates, increasing direct tokenholder yield potential, source: Uniswap v3 documentation and Uniswap Foundation governance forum. For ETH, EIP-1559 burns the base fee from every transaction and the post-Merge issuance reduction ties network activity to net ETH supply, periodically rendering ETH deflationary and strengthening value accrual to holders, source: Ethereum Foundation and EIP-1559 specification. For XRP, the XRP Ledger destroys transaction fees and enabled the XLS-30 AMM in 2024 to deepen on-chain liquidity, so higher usage can increase fee burn and utility while mechanically reducing circulating XRP, source: XRPL Foundation documentation and RippleX Dev announcement. Trading takeaway: monitor Uniswap fee-switch governance milestones, Ethereum gas-burn intensity, and XRPL AMM volume and TVL because rising protocol revenue or burn rates can support rerating in UNI, ETH, and XRP during risk-off periods, source: Matt Hougan on X and the respective protocol documents.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3136 deposited 512,440 UNI worth $3.64M to Binance after nearly five years of holding, described as a capitulation with a realized loss of $11.64M (-76%) (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025; Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA). The same wallet had previously withdrawn 512,440 UNI from Binance in April 2021 at an average price of $29.83, valued at $15.28M at that time (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025). Based on these figures, the implied transfer price is approximately $7.11 per UNI ($3.64M/512,440), providing traders a reference level for the whale’s exit on Binance (source: calculation from @lookonchain-reported amounts on X, Nov 20, 2025). The on-chain movement increases exchange-available UNI on Binance by 512,440 tokens, which can be monitored via the Arkham Intelligence address page (source: Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA; @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, whale address 0x313 deposited 512.34k UNI (approximately $3.64M) to Binance about 10 minutes ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd, Nov 20, 2025). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the address accumulated these UNI around five years ago at a total cost of $15.29M with an average entry price of $29.84 (source: @OnchainDataNerd). According to @OnchainDataNerd, if the entire amount were sold at the current price, the realized loss would be about $11.65M, reflecting an ROI of -76% (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 512,440 UNI worth about $3.64M into Binance after holding the tokens for 5 years, based on Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen, the same address 0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA initially withdrew these UNI from Binance at a valuation of $15.34M and is currently down roughly $11.7M on the position (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). Per @OnchainLens using Nansen data, this transfer places 512,440 UNI on Binance, increasing on-exchange supply by that amount (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @camillionaire_m, every traditional finance professional she has spoken with who understands how Uniswap works considers it brilliant, indicating strong cross-sector sentiment toward the protocol’s AMM design, source: @camillionaire_m on X, Nov 18, 2025. Uniswap operates as a decentralized exchange using an automated market maker and liquidity pools for on-chain swaps, offering permissionless liquidity and transparent pricing, source: Uniswap Docs. For traders, this positive TradFi feedback serves as a sentiment input when tracking UNI and the DEX sector, with attention to Uniswap liquidity depth and trading volumes, source: @camillionaire_m on X, Nov 18, 2025.

According to @lookonchain (X, Nov 17, 2025), a wallet linked to Amber Group accumulated about 1.41M UNI (~$11M) over the past three days. @lookonchain reports the wallet deposited 1.39M UNI (~$10.98M) to Coinbase Prime about an hour ago, noting it is likely for custody (X, Nov 17, 2025). On-chain records for address 0x011D19410FC79F140C08ffa8301e4153F17F4e27 on Arkham Intelligence show balances and transfers consistent with these figures (Arkham Intelligence explorer, link cited by @lookonchain on X, Nov 17, 2025). Traders can monitor this address and Coinbase Prime flows to assess near-term UNI liquidity using @lookonchain updates and Arkham Intelligence data as references (X, Nov 17, 2025; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Amber deposited 1.392M UNI worth about $10.98M to Coinbase roughly 30 minutes ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The transfer is linked to address 0x011D19410FC79F140C08ffa8301e4153F17F4e27, which is labeled and traceable via Arkham Intelligence, indicating funds moved to a Coinbase-associated destination (source: Arkham Intelligence; @OnchainDataNerd). Exchange inflows are widely used by traders as indicators of potential near-term sell-side liquidity and are monitored for impacts on UNI spot and derivatives markets (source: Glassnode Academy, Exchange Flows).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the mid-term altcoin selloff appears finished after five consecutive weekly declines, setting up potential strength for UNI if altcoins rebound, with the view explicitly sourced to @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, UNI is in focus due to the Uniswap fee switch proposal and is not facing historical supply overhang, positioning it as a fundamentally supported outperformer, as stated by @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, UNI has retraced to pre–fee switch proposal price levels, creating a perceived entry advantage, per @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the bullish thesis is invalidated if UNI breaks below 6.5 USD, offering a clear risk level for traders, as cited from @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, Arthur (@CryptoHayes) transferred 320,000 LDO worth 239K to Wintermute from address 0x6cd66dbdfe289ab83d7311b668ada83a12447e21, source: @OnchainLens. Over the past 2 days, the same address sold approximately $7.4 million worth of ETH, ENA, LDO, AAVE, UNI, and ETHFI, source: @OnchainLens. These sales span both major assets and DeFi tokens, and the address to monitor is 0x6cd66dbdfe289ab83d7311b668ada83a12447e21, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @OnchainLens, Arthur Hayes transferred 260 ETH (~$820K), 2.4M ENA (~$657K), 640,000 LDO (~$480K), 28,670 UNI (~$211K), and 1,630 AAVE (~$290K) to Cumberland from address 0x6cd66dbdfe289ab83d7311b668ada83a12447e21, with figures based on Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). @OnchainLens characterized the move as likely to sell, citing Nansen as the data source (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). @OnchainLens also noted this was a further tranche of tokens sent to Cumberland (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @lookonchain, Arthur Hayes sold 260 ETH about 820,000 USD, 2.4M ENA about 651,000 USD, 640,000 LDO about 480,000 USD, 1,630 AAVE about 289,000 USD, and 28,670 UNI about 209,000 USD in recent transactions posted on X on Nov 16, 2025, source: @lookonchain. Based on these figures, the combined notional sold is roughly 2.45 million USD, source: @lookonchain. The sales span majors and DeFi tokens including ETH ENA LDO AAVE UNI and were characterized as heavy dumping by the tracker, source: @lookonchain. Traders monitoring whale flows can reference the cited X post for precise sizes and timing of the offloads, source: @lookonchain.

According to Onchain Lens, a whale sent 1.19M UNI worth about $10.54M to Binance and also deposited 74,281 LINK (~$1.07M), 764,376 PENDLE (~$1.85M), and 8,936 AAVE (~$1.66M), all below cost basis (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, the losses versus cost basis are about $752K on LINK, $1.77M on PENDLE, and $570K on AAVE (data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, the same wallet sold 220,351 AERO for $186,086 USDC and still holds 150,000 AERO valued near $125K (data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, the address is 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A (data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, based on the reported figures the total assets deposited to Binance are approximately $15.1M, with aggregate losses on LINK, PENDLE, and AAVE near $3.09M relative to cost basis (data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Galaxy Digital withdrew a total of 324,440 UNI, valued at approximately $2.44 million, from Binance and Bybit about an hour ago (source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1989197120197599408). The transactions are attributed to address 0x16F6d15381bEE4A25B25F0d1C4161b78f7F21Fde, which can be verified on Arkham Intel (source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x16F6d15381bEE4A25B25F0d1C4161b78f7F21Fde).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Monetalis accumulated 1.85M UNI worth about USD 14.33M from Wintermute and Flow Traders within 24 hours and transferred 72.9M ARB worth about USD 19.62M to Wintermute and B2C2, with the activity tied to address 0x5eE84D30c7EE57F63f71c92247Ff31f95E26916B (source: @OnchainDataNerd). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the reported valuations imply roughly USD 7.74 per UNI and USD 0.269 per ARB, offering traders concrete reference levels for recent on-chain transfer pricing (source: @OnchainDataNerd). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the net reported value flow over the period was approximately USD 5.29M out of the Monetalis address, with the address viewable at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5eE84D30c7EE57F63f71c92247Ff31f95E26916B (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @EmberCN, after a UNI top-chase long was liquidated and nearly wiped the account again, the trader deposited 709,000 USDC from Binance to Hyperliquid roughly one hour before the post, then added to ETH and UNI long positions, source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN and the linked Hyperliquid hyperbot page, the account now shows approximately $6.2 million in ETH longs and about $200,000 in UNI longs on Hyperliquid following the deposit, source: @EmberCN on X; source: Hyperliquid hyperbot.

According to @lookonchain, Machi Big Brother deposited 709,142 USDC on HyperLiquid to continue adding long exposure in ETH and UNI, source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, the current reported positions are 1,750.7 ETH valued at 6.2 million dollars and 25,002 UNI valued at 201 thousand dollars, source: @lookonchain. Based on figures provided by @lookonchain, total reported open exposure is approximately 6.401 million dollars, making the new deposit about 11 percent of that amount, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a wallet linked to Monetalis received 1.92M UNI valued at USD 14.95M over the past 16 hours from B2C2 Group, Wintermute, and Flow Traders, lifting its total holdings to 5.84M UNI valued at USD 44.96M. According to @lookonchain via Arkham Intelligence's address page 0x5eE84D30c7EE57F63f71c92247Ff31f95E26916B, the latest 1.92M UNI inflow implies an average of about USD 7.79 per UNI based on @lookonchain's figures.

According to Lookonchain, Machi Big Brother (@machibigbrother) was liquidated 5 times on his ETH and UNI positions within the past hour, pushing his cumulative losses above $15.89M and leaving an account balance of $61,783, source: Lookonchain post on X dated Nov 12, 2025. Lookonchain cites the Hyperdash trader page for address 0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872, which reflects the liquidation events and current balance for verification, source: hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872.

According to @bubblemaps, another $15 million in UNI was sent to Coinbase, bringing the cumulative UNI off-ramped by a single entity to roughly $250 million, signaling sustained exchange-bound outflows from that wallet; source: Bubblemaps on X, Nov 12, 2025 — x.com/bubblemaps/status/1988560926682054755 and x.com/bubblemaps/status/1988221631563788699

According to @EmberCN, the on-chain trader known as Maji chased UNI yesterday morning and was trapped near the top, which dragged down a previously $1.09M unrealized profit on his ETH long. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1988413911985778779; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 Multiple liquidation rounds since last night hit his ETH and UNI long positions, leaving roughly $190K margin in the address. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1988413911985778779; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 Since a major liquidation on 10/11, he has traded smaller size and repeatedly topped up several-hundred-thousand-dollar margin, yet still lost another $3.2M over the past month. Source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1988413911985778779; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872

According to @santimentfeed, UNI rose approximately 70% week-over-week, coinciding with a new fee proposal to burn 100M tokens as part of redirecting protocol revenues to token burns and the launch of features aimed at enhancing liquidity provider rewards, based on Santiment’s update. Santiment reports a 4-year high in daily whale transactions that aligned with a local top in UNI’s price, indicating heightened large-holder activity at key levels. Santiment also notes the highest number of new UNI wallets in three years, suggesting elevated retail participation. Santiment states that monitoring daily whale transactions and network growth (new UNI wallets) will likely drive UNI’s price swings through November.

According to @Matt_Hougan, Coinbase has relaunched ICOs while Uniswap has activated its fee switch, marking what he describes as a major new era of on-chain capital formation in crypto, which places issuance and protocol fees at the center of market structure changes. Source: @Matt_Hougan on X, Nov 11, 2025. According to @Matt_Hougan, traders should focus on UNI for any market response tied to protocol fee accrual narratives and on COIN and Coinbase-listed ICO assets for shifts in primary issuance and liquidity, given the developments he highlights. Source: @Matt_Hougan on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @santimentfeed, Uniswap’s UNIfication proposal would activate protocol fees, route revenue to UNI burns, introduce MEV auctions, and burn 100 million UNI from the treasury, creating direct value capture for the token. source: @santimentfeed. UNI has rallied roughly 38–50% alongside growing community support, with a pivotal governance vote expected to determine fee activation and token burn mechanics that could reshape DEX tokenomics and UNI liquidity dynamics. source: @santimentfeed. Meme coins dominate social chatter as DOGE gains 3.94% and shows constructive technicals, while privacy coins like ZEC and XMR lag amid regulatory pressure, tilting momentum toward high-beta assets over privacy plays. source: @santimentfeed. Traders are tracking a social sentiment correlation where prior McRib menu returns coincided with major BTC rallies since 2017, using it as a potential sentiment-driven tailwind in Bitcoin positioning. source: @santimentfeed. Policy flow includes a Senate-passed bill to end a 41-day shutdown, a bipartisan Agriculture Committee draft to classify BTC and major tokens as commodities under CFTC oversight, and Treasury/IRS guidance enabling crypto ETFs to stake and distribute rewards, collectively improving perceived regulatory clarity and institutional participation outlook. source: @santimentfeed. On Solana, Wallchain’s Quack Heads Genesis mint is live at 2.5 SOL with rapid sell-through and strong community anticipation for potential $QUACK airdrops, adding near-term NFT liquidity catalysts to SOL ecosystems. source: @santimentfeed.

According to @CoinMarketCap, UNI initially jumped 43% to 10.05 after Uniswap proposed a fee switch that routes protocol fees to UNI burns, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. The proposal includes a retroactive burn of 100 million UNI, equal to 10% of the treasury from the beginning, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V2, liquidity providers receive 0.25% while a 0.05% protocol fee is directed to UNI burn, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V3, 0.01% and 0.05% fee tiers send one quarter of LP fees to UNI burn, while 0.30% and 1% tiers send one sixth of LP fees, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. It also allocates 100% of Unichain sequencer fees to burn, estimated at about 7.5 million dollars annualized before L1 data costs and a 15% share to Optimism, and includes aggregator hook fees for V4 pools, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. A Protocol Fee Discount Auction lets bidders win time-limited zero-fee swaps with the winning bid burned and is estimated to raise LP returns by about 0.06 to 0.26 dollars per 10,000 dollars traded, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. Other items include zero fees for frontend, wallet, and API, and a 2% UNI allocation of 20 million vested quarterly to fund protocol growth, source: @CoinMarketCap on X.

According to @OnchainLens, whale trader Machi (@machibigbrother) was partially liquidated on leveraged ETH and UNI long positions during a sudden market downturn, and he closed part of those positions. Source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. On-chain tracker Hyperbot for address 0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 shows partial position closures and liquidation events linked to these ETH and UNI longs. Source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. This liquidation and subsequent position reduction indicate forced deleveraging by a large market participant during the drop, aligning with the timing reported. Source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, whale address 0x20d6 purchased 523,007 UNI valued at approximately 4.44 million US dollars via FalconX on Nov 11, 2025, source: Lookonchain. The address 0x20d6 is viewable on the Arkham Intelligence explorer as referenced in the alert, source: Arkham Intelligence; Lookonchain. The implied average acquisition price is about 8.49 US dollars per UNI based on the reported token amount and USD value, source: Lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, Arthur Hayes bought 28,670 UNI valued at approximately $257,000 from FlowDesk, with the buyer address identified as 0x6cd66dbdfe289ab83d7311b668ada83a12447e21; source: OnchainLens. This purchase was reported on Nov 11, 2025, highlighting a notable UNI whale transaction with FlowDesk as the counterparty; source: OnchainLens.

According to @lookonchain, the five most profitable traders on Hyperliquid are positioned as follows: BitcoinOG (1011short) closed all ETH longs; Anti-CZ Whale is long ETH and DOGE while short ASTER and PEPE; Resolve Labs and Eternal BTC Shorter 0x5D2F are both shorting with assets not specified in the source; and the 20-Win-Streak Trader is long ETH, BTC, SOL, and UNI, source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 11, 2025. The mix shows majors-focused longs alongside meme coin shorts and one top account exiting ETH long exposure, source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a newly created wallet 0xA25...4Fd08 withdrew 474,000 UNI worth approximately $4.065 million from Coinbase within the past hour, with the transfer visible on the Nansen wallet profiler for 0xA25...4Fd08. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Nansen wallet profiler. Traders tracking UNI liquidity can monitor subsequent movements of 0xA25...4Fd08 to assess exchange outflow dynamics and potential supply shifts on Coinbase. Source: Nansen wallet profiler; @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @EmberCN, a tracked trader’s cross-margin longs are close to liquidation, with UNI long liquidation at $7.45 and ETH long liquidation at $3,526 while ETH traded around $3,575 at the time, roughly $50 above liquidation, source: @EmberCN on X; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. Because the account uses cross margin, losses on the UNI position are pulling the ETH long nearer to its liquidation level despite prior unrealized gains, source: @EmberCN on X. Traders can monitor $7.45 on UNI and $3,526 on ETH as critical levels for potential forced closeouts on this account, with position details referenced on-chain, source: @EmberCN on X; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. These figures reflect the status at the time of posting and can change with market moves, source: @EmberCN on X; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a tracked trader holds ETH and UNI long positions totaling $23.17M with ETH at +$578K unrealized PnL and UNI at -$532K, resulting in a narrow net +$46K, source: @ai_9684xtpa; data: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. The UNI long has an average entry of $9.73 and, after briefly hitting $10.3, retraced nearly 20%, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @lookonchain, a whale deposited 1.71M UNI (about $15M) accumulated between Feb 4 and Oct 12 into Binance, with Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A and 0x3300eebeEA8239b90a435e403B130a853A0d7DfF cited as on-chain evidence (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). Selling the full position at current prices would realize an estimated $1.45M loss versus the acquisition cost, per @lookonchain (source: @lookonchain).

According to Lex Sokolin, Uniswap is set to turn on protocol fees and "YOLO the token" (source: Lex Sokolin on X, Nov 11, 2025). The post links to a tweet by Hayden Adams, indicating the statement references that thread (source: Lex Sokolin on X, link: x.com/haydenzadams/status/1987990314997739625). No timing or parameter details were provided in the cited post (source: Lex Sokolin on X, Nov 11, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale or institution deposited 1.19M UNI worth $10.54M to Binance while incurring a $914K loss, based on Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A accumulated the UNI from Binance and Flowdesk between Feb 5, 2025, and Oct 12, 2025 for a total cost of $11.45M, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens using Nansen figures, the estimated average acquisition cost is about $9.62 per UNI versus an implied deposit value near $8.86 per UNI.

According to @OnchainLens, wallet 0xB29 deposited $1.19M USDC into HyperLiquid and opened a UNI long with 5x leverage, with the position valued at $4.47M and a liquidation price of $7.40, source: @OnchainLens; hyperbot.network/trader/0xB2929cD026A23AAc1b5D5699E56C9dFf26b60eB3. Traders can track UNI’s price relative to the $7.40 liquidation level and the reported $4.47M notional when assessing risk on UNI derivatives, source: @OnchainLens; hyperbot.network/trader/0xB2929cD026A23AAc1b5D5699E56C9dFf26b60eB3.

According to @lookonchain, wallet trader gud.hl purchased 256,000 UNI for about $2.4 million roughly six hours earlier and exited around 30 minutes ago with a realized loss of $69,400, implying an average entry near $9.38 per UNI based on the reported figures, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1988108848042045754; DeBank wallet history debank.com/profile/0x4f12b217aa59e6d3e1f91ca2dc96f9543576618b/history. The same source states the address has flipped into a 10x leveraged short on UNI that is currently showing an unrealized loss of about $8,500, underscoring the FOMO risk highlighted by Lookonchain and indicating price moved against the short in the very short term, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1988108848042045754; DeBank wallet history debank.com/profile/0x4f12b217aa59e6d3e1f91ca2dc96f9543576618b/history.

According to @lookonchain, smart whale address 0x9263 flipped from short to long on BTC, ETH, SOL, and UNI six days ago and now holds over $8.5 million in unrealized profit on these positions (source: Lookonchain on X). According to @lookonchain, the trader is on a 20-win streak and has generated more than $31 million in total profit on Hyperliquid (source: Lookonchain on X). According to @lookonchain, this reflects concentrated long exposure across major crypto assets on Hyperliquid backed by a sustained winning record (source: Lookonchain on X).

According to the source, the Uniswap Foundation announced a governance proposal to activate Uniswap protocol fees and implement UNI token burns, while restructuring the ecosystem under a unified development model led by Uniswap Labs, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement. For traders, protocol fees establish on-chain revenue and token burns reduce circulating UNI, making governance voting and rollout milestones key catalysts to monitor for UNI price, liquidity, and funding dynamics, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement.

According to @ki_young_ju, Uniswap (UNI) could go parabolic if the protocol fee switch is activated, citing roughly $1T in year-to-date volume for v2 and v3 and estimating about $500M in annual burns if volume holds (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025). He adds that exchanges hold about $830M worth of UNI, implying a potential supply shock even with unlocks if the burn mechanism turns on (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025).

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap’s new fee switch proposal is live and is driving community analysis of potential impacts for holders and the broader DeFi market. Source: CoinMarketCap. In Uniswap v3, enabling the protocol fee diverts a portion of LP fees to the protocol treasury governed by UNI holders, mechanically reducing LP fee yields while establishing protocol revenue. Source: Uniswap v3 Documentation. Execution depends on governance stages including Snapshot signaling and an on-chain vote that must meet quorum and threshold requirements, so traders should track the vote timeline and parameters. Source: Uniswap Governance Documentation. Any fee activation is configured per pool and can alter liquidity depth and trading costs, which may shift volumes across DEXs and impact UNI-related market flows. Source: Uniswap v3 Documentation.

According to Onchain Lens, Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation proposed a UNIfication plan to activate protocol fees and burn UNI, drawing notable whale accumulation, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. Three whales purchased a combined 635,680 UNI for approximately $5.56M at execution prices between $8.27 and $8.97, implying a volume-weighted average near $8.75, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. Whale 0xb1f bought 254,441 UNI for $2.28M in USDT at $8.97, whale 0x0f1 bought 199,818 UNI for 504 ETH valued around $1.78M at $8.92, and whale 0x555 bought 181,421 UNI for $1.50M in USDC at $8.27, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. The reported addresses are 0xb1f4f8edfbe7f41371d3b9b520da14c4927fd16d, 0x0f11d9df629d99095b772d57ae4478ba528f968a, and 0x555187752ef6d73758862b5d364aab362c996d0e, providing concrete on-chain references for tracking cost basis and liquidity bands near $8.27–$8.97, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen.

According to @OnchainLens, trader Machi opened a new 10x leveraged long position in UNI after a series of losses; source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, Machi is still holding a 25x leveraged long position in ETH with approximately 700,000 dollars in floating profit; source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the position activity can be verified via the address shared by OnchainLens on the HyperBot tracker; source: @OnchainLens.

According to @santimentfeed, social data show BTC is trending after a breakout above $106K, optimism around a US government shutdown resolution, growing acceptance via over 4 million Square merchants with zero-fee Bitcoin payments, and reinforced confidence from large purchases by Michael Saylor, making BTC pairs a key focus for liquidity and momentum trading (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, STRK is a top gainer with a 32% rise driven by development activity, protocol upgrades, strong staking, volume surges, notable token unlocks, and TVL nearing 2024 highs, positioning STRK pairs for elevated volatility and follow-through trades (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, UNI is trending on the ‘UNIfication’ proposal to activate protocol fees, burn millions of UNI, and unify core teams, introducing tokenomics changes and supply reduction that traders are monitoring for impact on UNI price and DEX fee flows (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, XMR is in focus after a 20% price jump amid discussions of default privacy, real-world payment adoption, and regulatory and delisting headwinds, making XMR markets sensitive to liquidity and headline risk (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, XRP is trending after five spot XRP ETFs were listed on the DTCC platform by Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, 21Shares, Canary Capital, and CoinShares, signaling potential institutional inflows that traders are watching across XRP spot and derivatives (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, USDT is trending as Tether reports $181B in assets and over $10B in profit, alongside strategic AI and infrastructure investments including a $150M AI commitment, backing Rumble, and plans to acquire Northern Data, with USDT pairs dominating new exchange listings and leverage activity (source: @santimentfeed).

According to Lookonchain, Hyperliquid trader 0x9263 closed shorts and flipped long on ETH, BTC, SOL, and UNI, with 20 trades since Oct 1 all profitable for a cumulative $23.7M profit. Source: Lookonchain; trade history verification: Hyperdash. This confirms a long bias by account 0x9263 in major crypto perpetuals on Hyperliquid at the time of reporting. Source: Lookonchain.

According to @Celo, Uniswap v4 is live on the Celo blockchain, bringing customizable and efficient DEX infrastructure to more than 600,000 daily users with low fees and fast swaps highlighted in the rollout, source: @Celo on Oct 28, 2025. According to @Celo, this live deployment enables immediate on-chain swaps via Uniswap v4 on Celo for CELO pairs and other Celo-native assets with a low-cost, high-speed profile emphasized in the announcement, source: @Celo. According to the source, the post was also shared by @UniswapFND via retweet, indicating acknowledgment from the Uniswap Foundation, source: @Celo and @UniswapFND.

According to the source, Eric Trump urged the crypto industry to prioritize hospitality and user experience, asking exchanges and DeFi platforms to become more user-friendly so big banks fade out of view. According to the source, the remark is qualitative and includes no data, timeline, regulatory proposal, or token-specific guidance, offering no immediate quantitative trading signal. According to the source, the statement explicitly targets exchanges and DeFi platforms, so any market impact remains narrative-only until measurable updates are disclosed by relevant projects. According to the source, no direct inferences can be made for CEX tokens (e.g., BNB, OKB) or DeFi governance tokens (e.g., UNI) from this statement alone.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, within 12 hours market maker GSR deposited to Binance 405,000 UNI (~$2.64M), 6,000 AAVE (~$1.38M), 16,000,000 USDC, and 682,000 WLD (~$636k). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the transfers were sent from an address referenced in the source post as GSR on Arkham. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the reported amounts imply an aggregate transfer value of roughly $20.7M based on the valuations provided in the post. According to @OnchainDataNerd, these transactions constitute exchange inflows to Binance by a market maker across UNI, AAVE, USDC, and WLD within a short time window.

According to @EmberCN, an address that received 30M UNI in Uniswap’s 2020 investor allocation moved 1.697M UNI (about $10.29M) to a Wintermute-labeled wallet within the past 5 hours; source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1979515399696965991 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf0446E60204C328bB22Af32e502e16032b109E60. After this transfer, the investor/organization address still holds approximately 24.9M UNI (about $149M); source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1979515399696965991 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5c72ab1005bE6452C0417Cc0B0C4D549fB7aE6E1. Arkham Intelligence labels the sender as the 30M-UNI investor allocation address and the recipient as a Wintermute address, with both wallets viewable at the above links; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5c72ab1005bE6452C0417Cc0B0C4D549fB7aE6E1 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf0446E60204C328bB22Af32e502e16032b109E60. Wintermute describes itself as a global algorithmic market maker; source: https://www.wintermute.com.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, 8 hours ago Cumberland withdrew 203.55B SHIB worth about $2.17M, with the referenced address 0x091D1C972cb1648537a2Ba78eaBa371b1cE18336 viewable on intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x091D1C972cb1648537a2Ba78eaBa371b1cE18336, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X Oct 15, 2025; ARKM explorer intel.arkm.com. Over the past week, the same entity withdrew a total of 17,243 ETH (~$71.37M), 224,000 AVAX (~$5.25M), 102,000 LINK (~$0.88M), 892,000,000,000 PEPE (~$7.17M), 203,000,000,000 SHIB (~$2.17M), and 220,000 UNI (~$1.48M), source: @OnchainDataNerd on X Oct 15, 2025. Based on these figures, the combined weekly withdrawals equal approximately $88.32M, with ETH representing about 80.8% of the reported USD value, source: calculation based on data from @OnchainDataNerd on X Oct 15, 2025. Traders can monitor subsequent movements via the referenced address 0x091D1C972cb1648537a2Ba78eaBa371b1cE18336 to track multi-asset on-chain flows across ETH, AVAX, LINK, PEPE, SHIB, and UNI, source: address link provided by @OnchainDataNerd on X Oct 15, 2025; ARKM explorer intel.arkm.com.

According to @OnchainLens, six wallets likely linked to a single entity spent 1,130 stETH valued at 4.29 million USD to purchase 626,778 UNI, 86,807 LDO, and 885,933 SUSHI, based on Nansen on-chain data. The wallets flagged were 0x1de1834839f6b201aa7f59e657acaee4ef613e46, 0xf2e2f8666a941a23acf19cb5391a76112c401f51, 0xecb5d9fc4cfb5496643e8f585f39bb3a649d473d, 0xb1b32328509552bde5df35a7e1ed5e66e57bc9a8, 0x18f6f2d530ce37a267ba88b6ce4f0f20d9207d85, and 0x5f2ad7385da24acda0b3730094dab5fba40b315d, as reported by @OnchainLens using Nansen data.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address withdrew 1,392 ETH (about $5.18M) and 428,000 UNI (about $2.52M) from Binance within the past hour, removing roughly $7.7M in assets from the exchange during that window, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The recipient wallet is 0x018C855271B1047705910CFC47ef428A88416E0D, which Arkham’s address explorer shows receiving these transfers, source: Arkham address explorer. The author notes that large on-chain UNI accumulation has been uncommon recently, and that UNI fell from $8.6 to $2 during the 10/11 flash crash and was around $5.8 at the time of posting, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to the source, a public social media post claims ETH DEX volume hit a new all-time high in Q3; traders should confirm the claim on independent dashboards before acting, source: public social media post, DefiLlama DEX Volume. Verify ETH pair volume, market share, and top pools via DefiLlama, Kaiko datasets, and Dune Analytics for Uniswap, then size orders to pool depth and set slippage accordingly, source: DefiLlama, Kaiko Research, Dune Analytics. Monitor ETH gas fees, burn rate, and funding to gauge execution costs and positioning pressure during elevated on-chain activity, source: Etherscan Gas Tracker, Ultrasound.money, Deribit Insights. Assess second-order effects on DEX tokens by tracking protocol revenue and active users for UNI and SUSHI, source: Token Terminal.

According to @EmberCN, 1.583 million UNI worth about 11.94 million USD left Uniswap’s UNI timelock around half a month ago, then roughly 10 hours before the post was sent to market maker GSR’s address and subsequently deposited to Binance. source: @EmberCN on X Sep 27, 2025 The transfer path and recipient address 0x2D994F6BCB8165eEE9e711af3eA9e92863E35a7A can be verified on Arkham Intelligence at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x2D994F6BCB8165eEE9e711af3eA9e92863E35a7A. source: Arkham Intelligence Historically, higher exchange inflows correlate with increased realized sell pressure and deeper immediate liquidity, so traders should monitor UNI exchange flows and Binance order book depth during this window. source: Glassnode Insights

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x4c64 purchased 155,455 UNI (about $1.51M) and 16,606 LINK (about $412K) roughly 10 minutes before the post, with an Arkham Intelligence address link provided as reference. According to @lookonchain, the wallet has now accumulated a total of 1.13M UNI (about $11M) and 74,281 LINK (about $1.84M). Based on @lookonchain’s reported USD amounts, the latest buys imply approximate execution prices near $9.72 per UNI and $24.80 per LINK, and the cumulative holdings imply approximate averages near $9.73 per UNI and $24.77 per LINK. According to @lookonchain, the transactions can be verified through the Arkham Intelligence page for address 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A.

According to the source, Uniswap Labs provides an API, the Uniswap Interface, the Uniswap Wallet and Unichain, collectively serving millions of users and enabling secure access to DeFi. Source: Uniswap Labs. The Uniswap Protocol reports more than 3 trillion dollars in cumulative swap volume, signaling deep onchain liquidity suitable for routing larger orders. Source: Uniswap Labs. For trading stacks, integrating Uniswap liquidity can enable onchain order execution for UNI and other major pairs with transparent, pool-based fees across concentrated-liquidity markets. Source: Uniswap Protocol documentation. Traders can monitor pool TVL, 24-hour volume and fee yields on Uniswap analytics to size orders and minimize slippage during volatility. Source: Uniswap analytics.

According to @EmberCN, 5.355 million UNI were moved to address 0xF436 four days ago, followed by subsequent transfers from that wallet into centralized exchanges (CEX) (source: @EmberCN on X). As of now, 780,000 UNI worth about $7.56 million have been deposited into multiple CEX from 0xF436, with the wallet and flows viewable on Arkham Intelligence (source: @EmberCN on X; source: Arkham Intelligence address 0xF436ADa6B8f4d235BA806f44B22Fa4ee115c9BC2). Traders monitor exchange inflows because rising on-exchange token supply is commonly used as a signal for potential sell-side liquidity and volatility (source: Binance Academy on exchange inflows/outflows).

According to @EmberCN, 5.355 million UNI (about USD 52.9 million) were transferred to address 0xF43...BC2, which is possibly tied to Anchorage Digital’s institutional platform, per @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, 200,000 UNI (about USD 1.97 million) were deposited to a centralized exchange 9 hours earlier. According to @EmberCN, this tranche was accumulated in 2023 via Anchorage Digital at an average cost of USD 4.95, implying about USD 27.5 million in unrealized profit at current prices, with the source address cited as 0x985D... on Arkham Intel per @EmberCN. For traders, according to @EmberCN, monitoring 0xF43...BC2 and 0x985D... on Arkham Intel for any further transfers to exchanges can help track near-term UNI supply dynamics.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x4940 deposited 408,557 UNI worth about $3.93M to Binance after buying the same amount two weeks ago at $10.06 for roughly $4.11M, implying a mark-to-market loss near $180K and an implied current price around $9.62, source: @lookonchain on X and Arkham Intel address 0x4940BFCfF28d58602aAbebA4e3E54D49d0D40460. The transfer was described as a move to cut losses and matches the full recent purchase size, with Binance identified as the destination exchange, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @santimentfeed, the top 10 addresses hold the following share of circulating supply for ETH-based assets: SHIB 62.3%, UNI 52.2%, ETH 51.0%, USDT 40.5%, PEPE 39.4%, LINK 31.5%, DAI 31.0%, and USDC 28.6%, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025. According to @santimentfeed, only SHIB, UNI, and ETH show majority top-10 concentration above 50%, while stablecoins USDT and USDC show 40.5% and 28.6% respectively, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025. According to @santimentfeed, traders can track live whale address changes at https://t.co/m99pJbV2cp for monitoring flows and concentration shifts, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale who previously netted $2.34M across four UNI swing trades allegedly cleared 4,720 ETH worth about $21.08M roughly 8 hours ago, described as a suspected full exit, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The source adds the ETH was withdrawn on July 1 from FalconX at an average entry of $2,452, implying a two-month ROI of 82.2%, source: @ai_9684xtpa. If the entire 4,720 ETH stack was sold, the realized profit would total approximately $9.514M based on the source’s calculation, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet address was provided by the source for on-chain verification and trader monitoring, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to Lookonchain, whales accumulated WLD, AAVE, and UNI via large exchange withdrawals totaling about USD 26.84 million within the last two days; source: Lookonchain. Whale address 0xF436 withdrew 43,123 AAVE, approximately USD 13.87 million, from exchanges over the past two days; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0xC0D9 withdrew 9.325 million WLD, approximately USD 8.86 million, from Binance about 11 hours ago; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0x4940 withdrew 408,557 UNI, approximately USD 4.11 million, from Binance; source: Lookonchain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address 0x494...40460 withdrew 408,557 UNI from Binance about 4 hours ago at a stated price of 10.06 dollars per UNI, totaling roughly 4.11 million dollars, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The source also shared the wallet address for tracking and characterized the movement as an exchange withdrawal of UNI from Binance, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet (0x4940bfcff28d58602aabeba4e3e54d49d0d40460) withdrew 408,557 UNI, worth about $4 million, from Binance. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet has not withdrawn ETH for gas to facilitate further transactions.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance’s WLFI contract reached a high of $0.55. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025. The author also referenced a fully diluted valuation of 55 billion and described WLFI as the sum of the FDVs of LINK, UNI, ENA, and ONDO. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025.

According to Patrick McCorry, the open question is why Governor Bravo-style governance sets quorum relative to the total votable supply rather than the sum of delegated tokens, and whether this choice was driven by gas constraints around 2021; he raised the issue on X on Aug 23, 2025. Source: https://twitter.com/stonecoldpat0/status/1959147607751790772 In Compound’s Governor Alpha/Bravo, quorum is a fixed absolute threshold (e.g., 400,000 COMP required) while voting power still comes from delegated votes at a snapshot block, meaning the quorum requirement is not tied to the currently delegated supply. Source: https://docs.compound.finance/v2/governance/ Uniswap’s Governor Bravo implementation defines quorum as 4% of UNI total supply at the snapshot block, explicitly anchoring quorum to total supply rather than the amount currently delegated. Source: https://docs.uniswap.org/concepts/governance/overview The design rationale for total-supply-based quorum is to ensure sufficient participation and mitigate governance capture, as the OpenZeppelin Governor framework specifies quorum as a fraction of the token’s past total supply via on-chain snapshots. Source: https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/4.x/governance#quorum For trading, total-supply-anchored or fixed absolute quorums make proposals dependent on broad participation before execution, which can slow or constrain fee or parameter changes that may act as catalysts for COMP and UNI until quorum is reached. Source: https://docs.compound.finance/v2/governance/ and https://docs.uniswap.org/concepts/governance/overview

According to @EmberCN, a Trend Research-labeled address withdrew 1,000,000 PENDLE (about $5.83 million) from Binance roughly 20 minutes before the post, signaling a notable CEX outflow (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the same address holds approximately 108,000 ETH (around $516 million) with an estimated cost basis near $2,250 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the address also holds about 670,000,000 NEIROETH, reported as 67% of total supply, with an estimated cost basis of roughly $0.0828 and an indicated value near $87.55 million (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the address further holds roughly 5,411,000 UNI, with the post noting quantity while the dollar value line is truncated (source: @EmberCN).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale withdrew 315,529 UNI worth about $3.55M from Binance roughly 10 minutes before the post, with the wallet address 0x4c6452f18d5967f1f7e9884bc5cdfc60452e015a, source: @OnchainLens. The whale now holds 814,724 UNI valued at about $9.17M, source: @OnchainLens. Based on the reported figures, the withdrawn amount equals approximately 38.8% of the wallet’s current UNI and lifted the balance by roughly 63% versus pre-transfer, source: @OnchainLens. The implied unit price from the stated valuations is about $11.26 per UNI at the time of reporting, source: @OnchainLens. The post is dated August 23, 2025, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @EmberCN, USV transferred 2.981 million UNI (~$31.09 million) to Coinbase Prime about 15 minutes prior to the source post and still holds 6.694 million UNI (~$69.82 million) at the referenced address; all figures and timing are cited from @EmberCN.