Crypto Entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried Faces Judge Over Use of Encrypted Messaging Apps While on Bail
Zach Anderson Mar 19, 2023 09:14
The lawyer representing crypto entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried will present a revised bail package to Judge Lewis Kaplan after Kaplan expressed concern about Bankman-Fried's use of encrypted messaging apps while out on bail. The entrepreneur had used Signal to contact former FTX and Alameda colleagues, which led Kaplan to forbid him from using such apps and threaten to revoke his bail privileges if he acted out of order.
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) began looking into charges of market manipulation in August 2021 and opened an investigation against the cryptocurrency exchange FTX as well as the company's founder Sam Bankman-Fried. Throughout the course of the inquiry, Bankman-Fried was detained and placed under custody; he faces various charges, one of which is that of aiding and abetting illicit trade. In order to stay out of prison, he agreed to pay a bail bond of $250 million, which at the time was the highest amount in the annals of United States history.
Concerns have been raised regarding whether or not Bankman-Fried would comply with the terms of his release as a result of the fact that he used encrypted chat applications while out on bail. The Department of Justice stated that his use of Signal and other apps constitutes a danger to the current investigation because it may impair the agency's capacity to obtain possible evidence. The argument was based on the fact that the applications may prevent the government from accessing potential evidence.
In response to these concerns, the attorney for Bankman-Fried will soon be proposing a revised bail package to Judge Kaplan. This new bail package is anticipated to contain more stringent monitoring mechanisms to ensure that the defendant complies with the terms of his release. The defense attorney has contended that Bankman-usage Fried's of encrypted messaging applications was not done with the intention of obstructing justice but rather with the intention of maintaining touch with former coworkers and employees.
The case sheds attention on the difficulties that law enforcement authorities have when attempting to investigate and prosecute crimes using cryptocurrencies, which sometimes include intricate technological hurdles and the use of encryption in order to maintain personal anonymity. It is possible that we will see further instances similar to this one in the future as the usage of cryptocurrencies continues to rise. This raises problems about how the legal system can properly govern and oversee new technologies like cryptocurrencies and blockchain.
Image source: Shutterstock