Quantum Computing vs Bitcoin (BTC) Security: 4.5M+ Dormant Coins, Timeline Estimates, and Trading Risks | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News
Latest Update
12/5/2025 1:42:00 PM

Quantum Computing vs Bitcoin (BTC) Security: 4.5M+ Dormant Coins, Timeline Estimates, and Trading Risks

Quantum Computing vs Bitcoin (BTC) Security: 4.5M+ Dormant Coins, Timeline Estimates, and Trading Risks

According to @Andre_Dragosch, Bitcoin’s network security is not the near-term weak point; the main quantum risk is to legacy wallets with exposed public keys that could be derived via Shor’s algorithm once sufficiently powerful hardware exists, not via brute-force of private keys, which is infeasible today, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X. For context, Google’s Willow system has 105 physical qubits, while breaking Bitcoin’s ECC would likely require roughly 5,000–10,000 logical qubits, implying hundreds of thousands to millions of physical qubits, placing the threat multiple engineering breakthroughs away, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X. Bitcoin’s network currently runs at about 1 zettahash per second, vastly beyond the reach of current quantum machines and expected capabilities in the foreseeable future, reinforcing low network-level risk for traders, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X. The concentrated exposure lies in older addresses: estimates suggest 4.5M+ BTC sit in dormant wallets that may never upgrade to quantum-resistant signatures, and a forced migration or sudden movement of these coins could create material sell pressure, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X. Timeline opinions vary widely, with ranges cited as 2029, around a 20% chance by 2030, and 2045–2065, highlighting uncertainty but also time for Bitcoin to implement quantum-safe BIPs and coordinate upgrades, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X citing @caprioleio, @VitalikButerin, and @adam3us. For trading strategy, the takeaway is low near-term quantum risk to BTC’s consensus while monitoring on-chain activity of Satoshi-era and other legacy wallets for unusual spending that could signal supply overhang, plus tracking progress on quantum-resistant BIPs as a mitigating catalyst, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X. Traditional finance may face quantum risk earlier due to widespread RSA/ECC usage in authentication and interbank communications, which, if compromised, could shift relative risk perceptions and support BTC’s digital bearer asset narrative, source: @Andre_Dragosch on X.

Source

Analysis

Is Quantum Computing a Real Threat to Bitcoin? Trading Insights and Market Implications

The ongoing debate about quantum computing's potential impact on Bitcoin has captured the attention of investors worldwide, especially following advancements like Google's 105-qubit Willow processor. As highlighted by economist André Dragosch in his recent analysis, the short answer to whether quantum computing threatens Bitcoin is both yes and no. This nuanced perspective is crucial for traders navigating the cryptocurrency markets, where Bitcoin (BTC) remains the dominant asset. Dragosch emphasizes that while the Bitcoin network itself is extraordinarily secure, boasting a hash rate of 1 zeta hash per second—equivalent to over a million El Capitan-class supercomputers—the real vulnerabilities lie in individual wallets, particularly legacy ones with exposed public keys. For traders, this distinction underscores the importance of monitoring network upgrades and quantum-resistant technologies, which could influence long-term BTC price stability and trading strategies.

In terms of trading opportunities, the quantum threat narrative could drive market sentiment shifts, potentially creating volatility in BTC/USD and BTC/ETH pairs. Without current real-time data, we can draw from historical patterns where similar tech concerns have led to temporary dips followed by recoveries. For instance, estimates suggest over 4.5 million BTC in dormant wallets, including Satoshi-era coins, might be at risk if quantum advancements accelerate. This could result in mass movements of these coins, exerting downward pressure on prices and offering short-selling opportunities for savvy traders. Expert timelines vary: some predict a 'Q-Day' as early as 2029 according to investor Charles Edwards, while others like Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin estimate a 20% chance by 2030, and cryptographer Adam Back projects 2045–2065. Traders should watch for support levels around recent BTC lows, such as the $60,000 mark seen in mid-2024, and resistance near all-time highs above $100,000, factoring in how quantum news might correlate with broader market indicators like trading volume spikes or on-chain activity.

Quantum Risks Versus Network Resilience: A Trader's Perspective

Delving deeper, Dragosch points out that quantum computers won't brute-force private keys anytime soon— that would take eons even for supercomputers—but algorithms like Shor's could derive keys from exposed public ones once sufficient logical qubits (around 5,000–10,000) are achieved. This puts a spotlight on upgrading to quantum-safe signatures, with Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) already in discussion. From a trading lens, this resilience bolsters Bitcoin's appeal as a store of value, potentially attracting institutional flows amid uncertainties in traditional finance. Interestingly, traditional banks relying on RSA and ECC keys may face quantum threats sooner, which could indirectly benefit BTC as a hedge. Traders might explore correlations with AI-related tokens like FET or AGIX, given quantum computing's ties to AI advancements; for example, positive quantum news could boost AI crypto sectors, leading to rotational trades from BTC into these altcoins.

Broader market implications extend to stock correlations, particularly with tech giants like Google (GOOG) involved in quantum research. If quantum breakthroughs accelerate, we might see increased volatility in Nasdaq-listed stocks, spilling over to crypto markets through ETF flows. Institutional investors, managing billions in BTC exposure via vehicles like spot ETFs, could adjust portfolios based on quantum risk assessments, influencing trading volumes and liquidity. On-chain metrics, such as the number of active addresses or whale movements, provide key signals; a surge in transfers from legacy wallets could signal preemptive selling, creating buying opportunities at discounted prices. Ultimately, Dragosch's bottom line—that Bitcoin's decentralized architecture offers superior security over centralized finance—reinforces a bullish long-term outlook, encouraging traders to stack sats while staying vigilant on quantum developments.

Strategic Trading Approaches Amid Quantum Uncertainty

For practical trading strategies, consider diversifying into quantum-resistant cryptos or monitoring derivatives markets for hedging. Options trading on platforms like Deribit could allow positioning for volatility spikes around quantum announcements, with implied volatility metrics serving as leading indicators. Market sentiment, gauged through tools like the Fear and Greed Index, often amplifies such narratives, potentially pushing BTC towards oversold conditions ripe for rebounds. In stock markets, correlations with AI-driven firms could open arbitrage plays; for instance, if quantum progress lifts GOOG shares, it might correlate with upticks in AI tokens, offering cross-market trades. With uncertainty high but adaptation pathways clear, traders should prioritize risk management, setting stop-losses near key support levels and scaling into positions based on confirmed on-chain data. This analysis, grounded in expert insights from December 5, 2025, highlights Bitcoin's enduring strength, positioning it as a resilient asset in an evolving tech landscape.

André Dragosch, PhD | Bitcoin & Macro

@Andre_Dragosch

European Head of Research @ Bitwise - #Bitcoin - Macro - PhD in Financial History - Not investment advice - Views strictly mine - Beware of impersonators.