According to @simplykashif, whale deposits to Binance fell by roughly 50%, dropping from $7.9 billion to $3.9 billion, indicating large investors are sending far less crypto to the exchange. Source: https://twitter.com/simplykashif/status/2004110131152540138 This points to lower near-term selling pressure from whales on Binance, per Kashif Raza’s assessment. Source: https://twitter.com/simplykashif/status/2004110131152540138

According to @lookonchain, over the past hour two additional whales deposited 5M USDC into Hyperliquid to buy HYPE; wallet 0xDAeF holds 214,497 HYPE (USD 5.44M) with USD 5.52M USDC remaining, while 0x3300 holds 102,460 HYPE (USD 2.61M) with USD 2.45M USDC remaining (source: @lookonchain). Based on those reported valuations, the combined position is 316,957 HYPE (~USD 8.05M) with USD 7.97M USDC left and an implied average entry near USD 25.4 per HYPE (source: @lookonchain); wallet pages can be verified on Hypurrscan: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x3300eebeEA8239b90a435e403B130a853A0d7DfF and https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xDAeFE10f4A12819674aAac0A6Fd4F246771d0AC5 (source: Hypurrscan).

According to @lookonchain, a whale address labeled t1dHhe withdrew 202,077 ZEC valued at $91.43M from Binance about 16 hours ago, source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, a second whale address labeled t1Nt2i withdrew 4,257 ZEC valued at $1.93M from Binance about 5 hours ago, source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, the combined outflow totals 206,334 ZEC worth $93.36M from Binance within roughly 16 hours based on the two reported transactions, source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, the addresses were referenced via Arkham Intelligence explorer in the report for on-chain context, source: @lookonchain.

According to @Andre_Dragosch, accumulation has been picking up among very large crypto “whale” wallet cohorts and small wallets, while mid-sized cohorts are not showing the same strength (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025). Overall accumulation activity is re-accelerating (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025). He also notes that whales are not necessarily identical with long-term holders (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, whale wallet nolimithodl.hl (0x330) purchased 98,739 HYPE on HyperLiquid for $2.9M USDC at an execution price of $29.37 per token, citing HyperTracker wallet data. According to @OnchainLens, wallet 0x1EC spent $1.3M USDC to increase its HYPE holdings to 97,697 valued at $2.85M and still holds $1.02M USDC for potential additional buys, citing HyperTracker. According to @OnchainLens, these flows total roughly $4.2M in recent HYPE accumulation on HyperLiquid and surface a visible reference level around $29.37 for intraday liquidity and risk management. According to @OnchainLens, traders tracking on-chain wallet activity and HyperLiquid order book depth can better gauge near-term supply-demand for HYPE.

According to @StockMKTNewz, Tom Lee and BMNR bought 138,452 additional Ethereum (ETH) over the past week (source: @StockMKTNewz, Dec 8, 2025). According to @StockMKTNewz, traders should verify this reported accumulation via on-chain wallet movements and exchange reserve changes before positioning in ETH spot or futures to assess potential flow impact (source: @StockMKTNewz).

According to the source, Ethereum whale buying has increased as the market rebounds after heavy liquidations (source: X post dated Dec 3, 2025). The update indicates large-holder accumulation during the recovery phase, a dynamic traders monitor for short-term liquidity and momentum in ETH price action (source: X post dated Dec 3, 2025).

According to @StockMKTNewz, Tom Lee and Bitmine (BMNR) purchased 96,798 ETH over the past week and now hold a total of 3.73 million ETH, source: @StockMKTNewz.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet deposited $3M USDC into HyperLiquid and placed an order to open a short position on HYPE between $35.7 and $36.7; source: @OnchainLens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1993912106555674694.

According to @EmberCN, Multicoin Capital bought 60,000 AAVE about 4 hours ago through Galaxy Digital OTC for about 10.68 million USD (source: @EmberCN). Over the past one and a half months, the firm accumulated 338,000 AAVE totaling about 60.46 million USD at a 219 USD average cost, showing an unrealized loss of about 13.5 million USD (source: @EmberCN). The purchases included 210,000 AAVE at 244 USD after the October 11 sell-off and 61,637 AAVE for about 10.94 million USD on November 25 (source: @EmberCN).

According to @StockMKTNewz, reported Ethereum balances for Tom Lee and $BMNR climbed from 2,830,151 ETH on 10/5 to 3,629,701 ETH on 11/23, a net increase of 799,550 ETH, up 28.3 percent, source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Nov 25, 2025. Weekly net adds were 202,037 ETH on 10/12, 203,826 ETH on 10/19, 77,055 ETH on 10/26, 82,353 ETH on 11/2, 110,301 ETH on 11/9, 54,156 ETH on 11/16, and 69,822 ETH on 11/23, ranging from 54,156 to 203,826 ETH per week, source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Nov 25, 2025. Average weekly accumulation over the period was approximately 114,221 ETH based on the reported updates, source: @StockMKTNewz on X, Nov 25, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet (0xd947E0D946e285f004958bfD3416D0357B0E8784) withdrew 47.18M WLFI worth approximately $6.95M from Binance in a single move (source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 24, 2025). According to @OnchainLens, the same address is likely to withdraw further, signaling potential continued WLFI outflows from Binance (source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 24, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance Smart Money’s seven-day PnL Top1 account “Mysterious K-Line” earned a net $2.116M over the last week, with most positions being shorts; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Nov 12, 2025); Binance Smart Money profile: binance.com/zh-CN/smart-money/profile/4736946588198249472. $COAI contributed $3.125M profit with 10 wins from 11 trades (91% win rate); source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Nov 12, 2025). $AIA added $0.877M profit across 2 trades with a 100% win rate; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Nov 12, 2025). The account also traded $ZEC five times with an 80% hit rate but still finished net negative on $ZEC due to a $1.42M loss on a short; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Nov 12, 2025). These figures show the top Binance Smart Money account’s PnL was primarily driven by short-side setups during the period and that $ZEC carried significant single-trade downside risk; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Nov 12, 2025).

According to @santimentfeed, a new Santiment Insights study visually maps how whale and micro wallet behaviors correlate with crypto price, showing that stakeholder flow patterns track market moves (source: Santiment). The research highlights that when micro wallets move opposite to whales, this divergence aligns with price inflections, offering actionable timing context for trades (source: Santiment). Traders can monitor whale accumulation versus micro wallet distribution as a confirmation filter for entries and exits based on the study’s on-chain analytics framework (source: Santiment).

According to @cryptorover, whales are buying Bitcoin (BTC) during the current dip, as posted on X on Nov 10, 2025 (source: Crypto Rover on X, Nov 10, 2025). The post does not provide on-chain metrics, wallet addresses, or price levels to substantiate the claim (source: Crypto Rover on X, Nov 10, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance Smart Money shows trader Hanmancheol short AIA with 94,093 tokens at a $7.46 entry, reflecting an unrealized loss of $620,000 and a return of -138.88% as reported, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; Binance Smart Money. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale account on Hyperliquid holds a 10x leveraged ZEC short worth $1.87 million (3,000 ZEC) with an entry at $629.53 and a posted liquidation price of $789.71, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; Hyperbot Network. These positions are publicly trackable and may update intraday; traders should confirm live metrics on the referenced dashboards before acting, source: Binance Smart Money; Hyperbot Network.

According to @lookonchain, three whale wallets accumulated a combined 17 million OVPP worth about 375,000 dollars over the past month, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xaca50a3a37d6f2ba49a9f9e3be949c342ac4b8a7 holds over 10 million dollars in assets and bought 7.6 million OVPP worth about 165,000 dollars from MEXC and decentralized exchanges, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xae84d81a8e74e5040a62300c66eb2181e38227ad bought 5.43 million OVPP worth about 117,000 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3bd532ff803378e651d456cee741e0d858d265fa bought 3.97 million OVPP worth about 87,000 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader who 25x longed ETH after the 10/11 flash crash flipped short yesterday, closed the short 10 hours ago with a $1.386 million realized loss, and is down $9.655 million over the past week, reflecting high churn in ETH derivatives (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Nov 6, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same wallet then reversed long again, holding 2,248.72 ETH (about $7.69 million) with an entry of $3,434.29 and currently in unrealized loss, indicating continued aggressive positioning amid volatility (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Nov 6, 2025). According to Hyperbot Network data for address 0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365, the position details match the reported size and entry, providing real-time tracking for this account’s leverage shifts (source: Hyperbot Network trader page for 0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365).

According to @lookonchain, three wallets spent $56.6K in the past hour to purchase 2.26M GHOST, signaling continued whale accumulation; source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1984905598639669741. The three buyer addresses are visible on Solscan at 4fLtB9CV97Y8tYLGycDRmJfVTsEVmyBFjNUx4v1FaJwg, BDB9bJ5fq16bRKsY1qg4ZNp2tgyPhy45bx5kevCFP665, and HnF1NS7ZqKjMnPtsmCfJxZKfrwe7Sajw3cmUZ3u37M27; sources: https://solscan.io/account/4fLtB9CV97Y8tYLGycDRmJfVTsEVmyBFjNUx4v1FaJwg https://solscan.io/account/BDB9bJ5fq16bRKsY1qg4ZNp2tgyPhy45bx5kevCFP665 https://solscan.io/account/HnF1NS7ZqKjMnPtsmCfJxZKfrwe7Sajw3cmUZ3u37M27. Based on the reported totals, the average acquisition cost is approximately $0.025 per GHOST and about $18.9K per wallet, with transactions occurring on Solana; sources: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1984905598639669741 and the Solscan links above. @lookonchain characterizes this as whales keep buying GHOST, indicating ongoing buy-side flow to monitor; source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1984905598639669741.

According to @AltcoinGordon, whales are beginning to accumulate $BULLISH at current levels, and the author characterizes valuations below a $20M market cap as a gift (source: X post, Nov 2, 2025, x.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1984887709937070400). According to @AltcoinGordon, $BULLISH could reach billions in market cap, signaling a strong bullish stance; however, the post provides no on-chain verification or trading volume metrics to substantiate whale accumulation (source: X post, Nov 2, 2025, x.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1984887709937070400). According to @AltcoinGordon, the only concrete trading reference is the sub-$20M market cap threshold, implicitly framed as an accumulation zone, with no independent data on liquidity, holder concentration, or market cap methodology included in the source (source: X post, Nov 2, 2025, x.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1984887709937070400).