According to @CryptoKing4Ever, WLFI is trading in an accumulation zone with a stated plan to build support near 0.167 and break resistance at 0.182, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Jan 9, 2026. ICO investors are reported to be in profit, noted as rare for 2025 and relevant for supply dynamics, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Jan 9, 2026. The 0.20 level is described as a magnetic price anchor and a key reference for near-term price behavior, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Jan 9, 2026. The outlined trade path is establish support at 0.167, clear 0.182, then look for continuation higher, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Jan 9, 2026.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, about 4 hours ago the WLFI team withdrew 162.69 BTC (approximately $15M) from Aave and swapped the entire amount for 4,611 WETH, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X (Jan 7, 2026). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the referenced wallet is listed at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/worldlibertyfi, source: @OnchainDataNerd. Based on the reported amounts, the executed cross-rate implies roughly 28.34 WETH per 1 BTC and an ETH/BTC ratio near 0.0353, derived from @OnchainDataNerd’s figures. This flow indicates a net position rotation in that wallet of -162.69 BTC and +4,611 WETH, with the ~$15M figure implying an approximate $3,253 per WETH at execution, source: @OnchainDataNerd.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI deployer address sent 24,000,000 WLFI to Binance after a three-week gap, valued at about $4.14 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa post on Jan 7, 2026. The transaction is attributed to address 0x407F66Afb4f9876637AcCC3246099a2f9705c178 as referenced for verification, source: Arkham Intel address 0x407F66Afb4f9876637AcCC3246099a2f9705c178. This inflow increases WLFI balances available on Binance and can directly affect order-book liquidity and spreads for WLFI pairs, source: on-exchange deposit reported by @ai_9684xtpa and the Arkham-identified address. Traders often track large exchange deposits as near-term liquidity events, and this transfer qualifies by size relative to typical token flows, source: @ai_9684xtpa post and Arkham Intel address evidence.

According to Bubblemaps, an alleged Polymarket insider wallet received approximately 250 SOL sourced from Coinbase, and a similar SOL deposit was made into Coinbase one day earlier that the post describes as a 99% match, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026. Bubblemaps further alleges the earlier Coinbase deposit is linked to a WLFI-associated wallet and concludes the two wallets are connected, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026. The post centers on exchange inflow patterns and wallet linkage involving SOL, a Polymarket insider wallet, Coinbase, and a WLFI-linked address, with no independent confirmation from Coinbase or Polymarket included in the post, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026. Traders tracking SOL and WLFI flows may note the alleged linkage and Coinbase inflow pattern highlighted by Bubblemaps for on-chain monitoring, source: Bubblemaps on X, Jan 5, 2026.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, since @Jackyi_ld disclosed a full allocation during Nov 23–26, five of six tokens have risen, delivering an 83.3% hit rate (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The top performers are BCH up 19.6% and WLFI up 15.46%, while ASTER is the sole decliner at -53.54% and has been exited via stop-loss (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). For ETH, the E Lihua wallet holds 626,574 ETH; a 46,036.72 ETH add on Dec 29 lowered the average cost basis to about $3,105.5, returning the position to break-even and recovering roughly $110 million in prior unrealized losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The wallet address is reported as 0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 via the Arkham link cited (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026). The ETH cost basis is calculated using the averaged cost after additional purchases during the period, as noted in the referenced post (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Jan 5, 2026).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, since the Nov 23–26 full-position disclosure, 5 of 6 tracked tokens are higher, a hit rate of 83.3%. Source: X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2008022345143972039 The top gainers are BCH up 19.6% and WLFI up 15.46%, while ASTER is the only decliner at minus 53.54%. Source: X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2008022345143972039 The ETH position cost is calculated on an average basis after additional buying during the period as noted in the quoted thread. Source: X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2008022345143972039 The quoted update adds that the E Lihua wallet holds 626,574 ETH, bought 46,036.72 ETH on Dec 29, lowered its on-chain average cost to about 3,105.5 dollars, and moved an unrealized loss of roughly 110 million dollars back to breakeven. Source: X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2007448445855158526 and ARKM https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 The wallet address is 0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43, providing on-chain verification for the reported ETH balances and cost basis. Source: ARKM https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8FDC74baD4AA20904a362D4b69434A0Cf4d97f43 For traders, the reported ETH average cost near 3,105.5 dollars offers a reference level for this whale’s positioning, while BCH and WLFI strength and ASTER weakness summarize recent relative performance within the disclosed basket. Source: X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2008022345143972039 and X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2007448445855158526

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance’s USD1 Earn APR is currently subsidized to 20%, with uncertainty whether the subsidy comes from Binance or WLFI (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The source notes USD1 is trading at a premium now, so the offer is more suitable for users who already hold USD1 rather than buying at a markup (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The single-account cap is $50,000; any amount above only earns 0.26% APR, materially lowering blended returns for larger allocations (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @bubblemaps, Justin Sun remains blacklisted by WLFI, and the value of his locked tokens fell by about 60 million USD over the last three months. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183 For traders, the continued blacklist and sharp locked-asset drawdown signal ongoing headline and liquidity risk around WLFI-related exposure and wallets linked to Sun. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183 Monitor WLFI updates and on-chain changes to Sun-linked addresses for any status shift that could alter market flows. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the World Liberty Fi deployer address transferred 10,000,000 WLFI to a Binance deposit address roughly 10 minutes before the post, valued at about $1.3 million; the cited wallet is 0x407F66Afb4f9876637AcCC3246099a2f9705c178 on Arkham (source: @ai_9684xtpa; source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x407F66Afb4f9876637AcCC3246099a2f9705c178). The author adds that this is the first major transfer from the World Liberty Fi Deployer to a centralized exchange, highlighting a notable exchange inflow for WLFI (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The author also hints the move may serve liquidity provisioning on Binance, signaling potential near-term trading supply dynamics for WLFI on the exchange (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a WLFI team multi-sig transferred 250,000,000 WLFI, valued at roughly 40 million dollars, to a wallet labeled Jump Trading about five hours prior to the post. Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Dec 4, 2025, link: https://t.co/3IdVYJhWCB. The author shared the recipient address and an on-chain screenshot confirming the large transfer. Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Dec 4, 2025. No additional details on onward distribution or exchange deposits were provided in the post. Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Dec 4, 2025. Traders can verify the flow via the linked address and monitor the recipient wallet for subsequent movements that could affect WLFI market liquidity. Source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Dec 4, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI project multisig transferred 250,000,000 WLFI valued at approximately 40.06 million USD to a Jump Crypto address about two minutes before the post, and the tokens have not moved further with the purpose unspecified; source: @ai_9684xtpa and on-chain reference: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xcc261Ab4bE137EACf57C19ed97c186b4d88004Ca. According to the source, traders can monitor the recipient wallet for any subsequent movements via Arkham to react to on-chain changes and potential exchange deposits if they occur; source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xcc261Ab4bE137EACf57C19ed97c186b4d88004Ca.

According to @OnchainLens, a wallet linked to the WLFI team deposited 73.16M WLFI (about $11.11M) to Binance roughly 13 hours ago; sender address: DHf6RvqxovvFcioBvzwKjLkhcXVcfb8TqnCEwgsAVM8m, with labeling and amounts sourced from Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). This is a large on-chain exchange inflow to Binance from a team-linked wallet and can be verified on the referenced Nansen dashboards, providing traders with a concrete flow event to monitor (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @CoinMarketCap, BTC dominance slipped while altcoins bounced, with BNB Chain market cap down 6.3% and WLFI up 13% this week, source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 27, 2025. @CoinMarketCap reports small-cap tokens and new infrastructure on BNB Chain continued to show strength as Orbs and THENA shipped new tools, source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 27, 2025. @CoinMarketCap also states that VanEck is eyeing a BNB ETF, source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 27, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet 0x9b3b deposited 2.5M USDC to Hyperliquid and opened a 5x long on 15.37M WLFI with $2.46M notional, source: x.com/lookonchain/status/1993872739057447214; hypurrscan.io/address/0x9b3b04662098fad71C1487B40f5dC3f4efF9280c. The position size implies an approximate WLFI entry price of $0.160 and an initial margin near $492,000 at 5x leverage, derived from the reported figures, source: x.com/lookonchain/status/1993872739057447214. The 2.5M USDC deposit exceeds the estimated initial margin by roughly $2.0M based on these numbers, source: x.com/lookonchain/status/1993872739057447214; hypurrscan.io/address/0x9b3b04662098fad71C1487B40f5dC3f4efF9280c.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet deposited 2.5M USDC into HyperLiquid and opened a WLFI long position with 5x leverage. Source: Onchain Lens on X; hyperbot.network/trader/0x9b3b04662098fad71C1487B40f5dC3f4efF9280c. The position is currently valued at about 2.4M, indicating active leveraged WLFI exposure on HyperLiquid. Source: Onchain Lens on X; hyperbot.network/trader/0x9b3b04662098fad71C1487B40f5dC3f4efF9280c.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a WLFI strategic reserve address accumulated approximately 66.36M WLFI valued at about $10.92M over the past 7 hours, and the author indicates the address is still acquiring more WLFI, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Nov 26, 2025, https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1993553740964806975. The author shared the address link for real-time tracking of further inflows: https://t.co/VyZg81KmJe, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X, Nov 26, 2025, https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1993553740964806975. Based on the totals reported, the implied average acquisition price is roughly $0.164 per WLFI (10.92M divided by 66.36M), derived from figures cited by @OnchainDataNerd on X, Nov 26, 2025, https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1993553740964806975.

According to @lookonchain, WLFI executed an on-chain buyback over the past 5 hours, spending 7.79M USD1 to purchase 46.56M WLFI at a 0.1674 average price. According to Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/worldlibertyfi, the buying address is labeled World Liberty Financial, corroborating the reported accumulation and execution window. According to @lookonchain and Arkham Intelligence, the average fill near 0.1674 and the identified entity wallet provide traders with a concrete reference level and on-chain address to monitor for follow-up flows.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI Strategic Reserve spent 5.54 million USD1 over the past 3 hours to repurchase 32.93 million $WLFI at an average price of $0.1684, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the buy orders were executed on-chain in a concentrated manner and $WLFI has risen more than 5% since the purchases, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The cited wallet is 0x5be9a4959308A0D0c7bC0870E319314d8D957dBB on explorer.cow.fi/address/0x5be9a4959308A0D0c7bC0870E319314d8D957dBB, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @cas_abbe, WLFI, described as Trump’s own project, is promoting a token with a market cap under $5 million, which the post characterizes as evidence of a real and intense bear market phase, calling it peak bear market vibes; traders may view this as a risk-off sentiment cue for micro-cap altcoins and liquidity-sensitive names (source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 25, 2025).

According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet at address 0xefa12c0926bc79e07f352f94b4b0a51c5df37df8 spent $30M in $USD1 to purchase 197.53M $WLFi over the past three days at an average price of $0.152, based on Nansen data (source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, the position shows a $1.5M unrealized profit, implying roughly a 5% gain on the $30M capital (source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, traders can reference the reported $0.152 average entry as a near-term cost basis level for monitoring whale accumulation dynamics in $WLFi (source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen). According to Onchain Lens, the time-distributed buys across three days indicate sustained on-chain accumulation by a single entity using $USD1 as funding (source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen).