According to @caprioleio on X (Dec 18, 2025), Bitcoin executives should address quantum computing risk early rather than assuming it is 20 years away, signaling a proactive security stance relevant for BTC traders. Source: @caprioleio on X, Dec 18, 2025. For trading, monitor post-quantum migration signals because NIST finalized core PQC standards in 2024 (FIPS 203 Kyber, FIPS 204 Dilithium, FIPS 205 SPHINCS+), which establish practical baselines for industry adoption timelines. Source: NIST 2024 FIPS publications. This matters operationally for BTC since Bitcoin uses ECC-based ECDSA and Schnorr (Taproot via BIP-340/341), which NIST classifies as vulnerable to sufficiently large-scale quantum computers, making any PQC roadmap or BIP proposals material for wallets, exchanges, and custody workflows. Source: NIST PQC guidance 2024; Bitcoin Core BIPs 340/341.

According to Adam Back, FIPS 205's SLH-DSA stands out as the strongest post-quantum secure digital signature candidate currently available, despite its relatively large signature size (source: Adam Back on Twitter, June 3, 2025). He recommends integrating SLH-DSA into new blockchain address formats alongside Schnorr taproot to address concerns over premature quantum threats. This move is particularly relevant for traders and blockchain developers seeking robust quantum-resistant security. Adam Back also highlighted the potential for future enhancements through signature aggregation using STARKs, suggesting further efficiency improvements for high-volume blockchain applications (source: Adam Back on Twitter, June 3, 2025). These developments may have a significant impact on cryptocurrency trading by increasing long-term asset security and supporting advanced blockchain scalability.