According to @EmberCN, a whale completed a stop-loss liquidation about four hours ago, unloading 96,585 ETH and 334,000 SOL over four days for roughly USD 214 million and USD 31.51 million, respectively. According to @EmberCN, the whale bought ETH at an average USD 3,363 last July and sold around USD 2,222 in recent days, realizing about USD 110 million in losses, and bought SOL at an average USD 186 last October and sold around USD 94. According to @EmberCN, the total realized loss from these disposals is approximately USD 141 million.

According to @lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs posted a 1-day net outflow of 1,185 BTC (88.96M USD) and a 7-day net outflow of 11,202 BTC (841.3M USD). According to @lookonchain, Ethereum ETFs recorded a 1-day net inflow of 17,340 ETH (38.15M USD) but a 7-day net outflow of 129,292 ETH (284.44M USD), while Solana ETFs showed a 1-day net inflow of 13,901 SOL (1.32M USD) and a negative 7-day net flow. Based on @lookonchain’s ETF flow data, traders may view the mixed daily inflows versus broad weekly outflows as short-term rotation into ETH and SOL amid continued weekly net selling pressure, informing liquidity and momentum assessments.

According to @ItsDave_ADA, roughly 75% of Solana Jupiter Aggregator v6 transactions failed, totaling about 8.39 million failed transactions (source: @ItsDave_ADA). According to @ItsDave_ADA, only about 25% completed successfully, and each failed attempt still consumed a fee (source: @ItsDave_ADA). According to @ItsDave_ADA, repeated retries mean users pay again, causing costs to compound quickly for active traders using Jupiter v6 on Solana (source: @ItsDave_ADA).

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs posted a 1-day net outflow of 8,080 BTC and a 7-day net outflow of 17,808 BTC (source: Lookonchain). Ethereum ETFs showed a 1-day net outflow of 108,075 ETH and a 7-day net outflow of 121,788 ETH (source: Lookonchain). Solana ETFs registered a small 1-day net outflow but a weekly net inflow of 76,944 SOL, indicating positive weekly demand relative to BTC and ETH (source: Lookonchain). For traders, ETF net outflows typically correlate with softer spot demand while multi-day inflows can signal relative strength, suggesting near-term relative resilience in SOL versus BTC and ETH based on the reported flow mix (source: Lookonchain).

According to @OnchainLens, the Bitcoin OG (10/11) was completely liquidated on its long positions in BTC, ETH, and SOL, realizing about $221.07M in losses and leaving just $54.58 in the wallet, with address details at hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317D2BC2D3d2Df5Fa441B5bAE0AB9d8b07283ae. According to @OnchainLens, the OG has lost approximately $128.87M overall.

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin OG wallet labeled 10/11 deposited 3,183 ETH worth about $8.04 million into Binance and is likely to deposit more. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet realized a $14.08 million loss on a partial ETH position and continues to hold remaining ETH, BTC, and SOL with an unrealized loss of about $135 million. According to @OnchainLens, these on-chain wallet activities are being tracked via the cited dashboards for ongoing monitoring.

According to @lookonchain, Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs saw 1D net outflows of 7,856 BTC ($653.98M) and 7D net outflows of 10,695 BTC ($890.28M) (source: @lookonchain). The same source reports Ethereum (ETH) ETFs posted 1D net outflows of 41,542 ETH ($113.83M) and 7D net outflows of 21,314 ETH ($58.4M) (source: @lookonchain). By contrast, @lookonchain notes Solana (SOL) ETFs had a 1D net outflow of 10,786 SOL ($1.26M) but a 7D net inflow of 96,033 SOL ($11.24M), highlighting a cross-asset divergence in ETF net flows (source: @lookonchain).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, $HYPE jumped 28.5% over 24 hours and Hyperliquid address 0x8de…92dae is the No.2 long holder, controlling 1,227,650.23 HYPE worth about $41.19M with an average entry of $22.36 versus a current $33.6, yielding roughly $13.72M in unrealized profit (source: @ai_9684xtpa and hyperbot.network/trader/0x8def9f50456c6c4e37fa5d3d57f108ed23992dae). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same wallet is also long $SOL with an unrealized loss of about $1.255M (source: @ai_9684xtpa and hyperbot.network/trader/0x8def9f50456c6c4e37fa5d3d57f108ed23992dae).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, HYPE rallied 28.5% in 24 hours as wallet 0x8de...92dae ranked Top 2 for Hyperliquid HYPE longs, holding 1,227,650.23 HYPE (~$41.19M) with a $22.36 average entry and a $33.6 mark price, showing about $13.72M in unrealized profit. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same address also holds a short on SOL with an unrealized loss of about $1.255M, and the wallet can be tracked via hyperbot.network/trader/0x8def9f50456c6c4e37fa5d3d57f108ed23992dae.

According to Onchain Lens, a Bitcoin OG wallet has increased its 5x leveraged long on ETH, now holding 212,726 ETH valued around USD 643M, alongside 511,612.85 SOL at roughly USD 66M and 572.71 BTC at about USD 51.09M, source: Onchain Lens. Despite the ramped exposure, the wallet is still showing a loss of USD 29.79M and has paid over USD 8M in funding on these positions, source: Onchain Lens.

According to @OnchainLens, the Bitcoin OG (10/11) partially closed 5x ETH and 5x BTC long positions with a realized loss of $9.73M and still holds positions with a floating loss of $50.94M. According to @OnchainLens, the address also bought 148,000 ETH worth $397.37M from Binance in the past 24 hours. According to @OnchainLens, current reported holdings include about 210,753 ETH, 1,000 BTC, and 511,613 SOL, highlighting continued exposure to major crypto assets.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xcA0...b2998 withdrew 30,000 ETH from Binance and has accumulated 148,000 ETH from exchanges since yesterday, with a reported notional value of about $427 million, based on on-chain traces cited by @ai_9684xtpa and ARKM intel data. According to @ai_9684xtpa referencing Aave on-chain data, the wallet has borrowed roughly $240 million in stablecoins to loop long, showing a health factor of 1.49 and an ETH liquidation level near $1,953.09. According to @ai_9684xtpa via the Hyperliquid tracker hyperbot.network, the trader cut 12,587.99 ETH longs at a realized loss of about $3.424 million and still holds approximately 210,752.65 ETH, 1,000 BTC, and 511,000 SOL longs with total position value near $767 million and an unrealized loss around $57.13 million. Based on the metrics reported by @ai_9684xtpa and the referenced ARKM and Hyperliquid trackers, traders should monitor Aave health factor, ARKM wallet flows, and Hyperliquid positioning for potential bid support from spot accumulation versus elevated downside liquidation risk around the stated ETH level.

According to @bubblemaps, the "10/10" whale closed $35M in ETH longs while still holding about $760M across BTC, ETH, and SOL. According to @bubblemaps, a later update says the trader is down roughly $100M for the week and is still holding approximately $800M in longs across BTC, ETH, and SOL. According to @bubblemaps, these disclosures highlight large directional exposure concentrated in major assets, so traders can monitor whale activity, funding rates, and open interest for potential liquidity shifts; no liquidation levels or detailed derivatives metrics were provided by @bubblemaps.

According to @Matt_Hougan, sharing a preview on X of his upcoming MR SHIFT podcast conversation with @KevinWSHPod, Bitcoin is still “super early” with a “two ways to win” setup, Solana has one of the best risk-reward profiles he’s seen, and the growth of stablecoins and tokenization could be explosive, with Chainlink and oracles emerging as key real-world asset connectors (source: @Matt_Hougan on X, citing his role as Bitwise CIO). He adds that underallocation by financial advisors is a notable signal and that potential sovereign buying could propel BTC toward 500K, implying upside optionality for BTC, relative strength potential for SOL, and rising narratives in stablecoins, tokenization, and oracles as key trading catalysts to monitor (source: @Matt_Hougan on X).

According to Onchain Lens, the Bitcoin OG wallet has partially closed its 5x ETH long position for a realized loss of $3.44M. According to Onchain Lens, the wallet still holds 210,752.66 ETH (about $615M), 1,000 BTC (about $88M), and 511,612.85 SOL (about $63M), indicating continued heavy exposure to ETH alongside BTC and SOL positions.

According to @lookonchain, BTC and ETH ETFs recorded net outflows over both 1D and 7D while SOL ETFs saw net inflows, highlighting diverging demand across these crypto ETF products; source: @lookonchain. Reported flows: BTC ETFs 1D -966 BTC (-$84.66M) and 7D -17,911 BTC (-$1.57B); ETH ETFs 1D -7,601 ETH (-$21.92M) and 7D -206,122 ETH (-$594.46M); SOL ETFs 1D +17,472 SOL (+$2.15M) and 7D +63,847 SOL (+$7.85M); source: @lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, trader 1011short (BitcoinOG) is under heavy pressure on a combined $779M BTC, ETH, SOL long on Hyperliquid, added another 20M USDC to margin, and saw total PnL drop from over $140M to $9.28M in one week, citing Hyperdash. According to Lookonchain, he also created a new wallet, withdrew 61,000 ETH from Binance to Aave, borrowed 60M USDC on Aave, and sent the USDC back to Binance, with the on-chain path shown on Arkham Intelligence. According to Lookonchain, these transactions indicate he appears to be looping ETH longs via collateralized borrowing while recycling liquidity between Aave and Binance.

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin OG whale on HyperLiquid deposited $20M in USDC to avoid liquidation amid a drawdown. The account shows an unrealized loss of $83.4M, an $8M funding decline, and realized profits dropping from $142.5M to $9.7M, source: @OnchainLens. Reported positions include 223,340.65 ETH, 1,000 BTC, and 511,612.85 SOL with large notional exposure across majors, source: @OnchainLens. Traders may monitor HyperLiquid liquidation and perpetual funding dynamics on ETH, BTC, and SOL as the whale manages margin and positions, source: @OnchainLens.

According to Lookonchain, on-chain records from Solscan show a wallet linked to Cooker.hl bought 16.5 million PENGUIN for 6 SOL and then sold the entire position for 6.12 SOL, realizing only a small gain. Lookonchain adds that, based on the same Solscan data, those 16.5 million PENGUIN would now be valued around 1.4 million dollars, meaning the trader missed roughly 1.4 million dollars in potential profit.

According to @ItsDave_ADA, 237.8 SOL was extracted via 7,008 sandwich attacks by 94 attackers over the last seven days at a total execution cost of 31.6 SOL, impacting 6,689 users, underscoring material execution risk for Solana traders; source: https://twitter.com/ItsDave_ADA/status/2014813757990658310. According to @ItsDave_ADA, this value extraction is a direct consequence of Solana’s architecture where transactions can be observed and reordered in real time, making sandwiching a rational strategy for faster actors. According to @ItsDave_ADA, users experience worse execution and unexplained slippage not due to natural price moves but because their orders are deliberately traded around. According to @ItsDave_ADA, higher throughput and faster blocks do not solve the problem and instead increase the opportunity set when ordering is discretionary and incentives are misaligned. According to @ItsDave_ADA, Solana’s speed-first design imposes a quiet, repeated cost on users one transaction at a time, while attackers accumulate profits.