According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF net flows on 2026-01-09 totaled a USD 250 million outflow, driven by IBIT redemptions of USD 252 million, partially offset by a USD 7.9 million FBTC inflow and a USD 5.9 million BITB outflow. According to @FarsideUK, ARKB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC reported zero flow for the day. According to @FarsideUK, the full dataset and disclaimers are available at farside.co.uk/btc.

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETF net flow on 2026-01-08 was -$398.8 million, led by redemptions from IBIT at -$193.3 million and FBTC at -$120.5 million, while GBTC posted -$73.1 million and ARKB -$9.6 million (source: Farside Investors). Small inflows went to BITB at $3.0 million and BTCW at $1.9 million, with BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and HODL reporting zero flow and the ticker BTC at -$7.2 million (source: Farside Investors). IBIT and FBTC together accounted for roughly 78.7% of the day’s net outflow by magnitude, GBTC represented about 18.3%, and these three tickers explained about 97.0% of total net outflows by magnitude (source: Farside Investors). Breadth was weak with five funds recording net redemptions, two showing net subscriptions, and four unchanged; total positive flow of $4.9 million offset only about 1.2% of the outflow magnitude, indicating that redemptions were concentrated among the largest issuers by daily flow (source: Farside Investors).

According to Farside Investors, BlackRock’s U.S. Bitcoin ETF posted a net outflow of 193.3 million USD on Jan 9, 2026 (source: @FarsideUK tweet dated Jan 9, 2026). Farside Investors provides the full Bitcoin ETF daily flows dataset and disclaimers for traders at farside.co.uk/btc (source: farside.co.uk/btc).

According to @FarsideUK, BlackRock’s US Bitcoin ETF recorded a daily net flow of -$130 million in USD in the Bitcoin ETF Daily Flow update posted on Jan 8, 2026. The update denotes this as a negative flow for BlackRock, indicating an outflow for the day, according to @FarsideUK. Data details and disclaimers are available on Farside’s Bitcoin ETF dashboard at farside.co.uk/btc, according to @FarsideUK.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded total net outflows of 486.1 million dollars on 2026-01-07, indicating broad redemptions across major funds, source: Farside Investors. The largest outflows came from Fidelity FBTC at 247.6 million dollars and BlackRock IBIT at 130 million dollars, with additional redemptions from ARKB at 42.3 million dollars, BITB at 39 million dollars, HODL at 11.6 million dollars, and GBTC at 15.6 million dollars, source: Farside Investors. Zero net flows were reported for BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW on the day, source: Farside Investors.

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net outflow of $243.2 million on 2026-01-06. Source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc and twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/2008762294373691477. IBIT posted a $228.7 million net inflow, while FBTC led outflows at -$312.2 million and GBTC saw -$83.1 million; ARKB registered -$29.5 million and HODL -$14.4 million, with BITB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW flat at 0 on the day. Source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc and twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/2008762294373691477.

According to @CoinMarketCap, Bank of America has approved four spot Bitcoin ETFs for its wealth advisers to recommend, including BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC, making BTC exposure accessible through the bank's advisory platform (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Jan 6, 2026). According to @CoinMarketCap, the bank is framing crypto as a 1%-4% allocation for suitable clients, providing advisers a defined range for portfolio implementation via spot BTC ETFs (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Jan 6, 2026).

According to @EricBalchunas, U.S. ETFs took in $7.1 billion on January 2, and at that daily pace would annualize to about $1.8 trillion in 2026 flows (source: @EricBalchunas). He said VOO led inflows, with SGOV also among the top intake funds (source: @EricBalchunas). He added IBIT ranked #10 with $287 million of inflows, putting a crypto-linked ETF in the day’s top cohort (source: @EricBalchunas). Balchunas noted the pattern looks very similar to last year and emphasized that while it’s early/noisy, narratives can get set early in a new calendar year (source: @EricBalchunas).

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETF net flows totaled $471.3 million on 2026-01-02, confirming a positive daily net inflow. Source: @FarsideUK; farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, ETF-level flows (US$ million) were: IBIT 287.4, FBTC 88.1, BITB 41.5, EZBC 13, HODL 8.3, ARKB 6.7, BTCO 4.5, BRRR 0, BTCW 0, GBTC 15.4; Total Net Flow 471.3 and BTC 6.4. Source: @FarsideUK; farside.co.uk/btc.

According to The Kobeissi Letter, Bitcoin ETFs are facing historic losses as IBIT recorded USD 244 million in net outflows last week, marking a second consecutive weekly withdrawal, source: The Kobeissi Letter, X, Jan 2, 2026. The Kobeissi Letter identifies IBIT as the largest Bitcoin ETF and states it has recorded outflows in 8 of the last 10 weeks, source: The Kobeissi Letter, X, Jan 2, 2026.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETF net flow for the month totaled -$1,092.5 million, based on the dataset at farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, the largest outflows came from IBIT at -$473.8m and GBTC at -$237.8m, while FBTC recorded +$86.6m and BTCW +$1.9m in net inflows, per farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, additional monthly totals were ARKB -$194.5m, BITB -$135.1m, HODL -$110.7m, BTCO -$3.9m, EZBC -$2.1m, BRRR 0, and the summary also lists BTC: -23.1, as reported on farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, IBIT and GBTC combined accounted for -$711.6m of the month’s net outflow, and only two funds (FBTC, BTCW) posted net inflows while the rest were negative or flat, per farside.co.uk/btc.

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a total net outflow of $348.1 million on 2025-12-31, marking broad redemptions into the year-end session (source: Farside Investors). According to Farside Investors, the largest outflows were IBIT at -$99.0M, ARKB at -$76.5M, GBTC at -$69.1M, and FBTC at -$66.6M, which together accounted for approximately 89% of the day’s total net outflow based on the reported figures (source: Farside Investors). According to Farside Investors, additional outflows included BITB at -$13.8M, BTC at -$11.2M, HODL at -$6.8M, and EZBC at -$5.1M, while BTCO, BRRR, and BTCW recorded zero net flow (source: Farside Investors). According to Farside Investors, the negative flow skew indicates net redemptions across major issuers on the day, reducing aggregate ETF-held BTC exposure for that session (source: Farside Investors).

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net outflow of $19.3 million on 2025-12-29 (source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc). IBIT saw -$7.9 million, BTCO -$10.4 million, and ARKB -$6.7 million, while FBTC posted +$5.7 million; BITB, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC all reported 0 flow (source: @FarsideUK). These issuer-level moves left combined outflows from IBIT and BTCO at -$18.3 million, partially offset by FBTC’s +$5.7 million, resulting in the -$19.3 million net for the day and indicating negative net demand via US spot ETFs on the session (source: @FarsideUK).

According to @EricBalchunas on X, silver is up about 150% year to date and is now doubling gold’s performance this year (source: @EricBalchunas on X). According to @EricBalchunas on X, SLV posted $21 billion in weekly trading volume, the highest in 15 years despite the Christmas week (source: @EricBalchunas on X). According to @EricBalchunas on X, SLV’s year-to-date net inflows are $3.4 billion, while GLD’s are $23 billion and spot Bitcoin ETF IBIT’s are $25 billion (source: @EricBalchunas on X). According to @EricBalchunas on X, the $21 billion weekly volume signals elevated liquidity for SLV execution and risk management based on the reported figure (source: @EricBalchunas on X). According to @EricBalchunas on X, the larger YTD flows into GLD and IBIT versus SLV indicate stronger investor allocation to gold and BTC exposure than to silver ETFs based on the cited flow data (source: @EricBalchunas on X).

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net outflow of 275.9 million dollars on 2025-12-26. source: Farside Investors Twitter post dated 2025-12-28; farside.co.uk/btc IBIT saw outflows of 192.6 million dollars, FBTC 74.4 million dollars, and GBTC 8.9 million dollars, while BITB, ARKB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, and BTC reported zero flow for the day. source: Farside Investors Twitter post dated 2025-12-28; farside.co.uk/btc The day’s flows were thus concentrated in IBIT and FBTC, with no creations or redemptions reported by the other listed funds for that date in the dataset. source: Farside Investors Twitter post dated 2025-12-28; farside.co.uk/btc

According to @EricBalchunas, BlackRock’s gold ETF IAU is up 64% year-to-date, its strongest gain on record by a factor of 3, and has taken in over $10 billion, also a record, source: @EricBalchunas. Despite this historic strength in gold flows, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF IBIT is featured among the firm’s biggest investment themes for 2025, source: @EricBalchunas. For traders, this juxtaposition highlights institutional focus on BTC ETF products alongside robust gold demand, making IBIT versus IAU net creations and asset flows a key relative indicator to watch, source: @EricBalchunas. Monitoring daily fund flows and volume divergence between IBIT and IAU can help gauge near-term BTC liquidity impact versus gold, source: @EricBalchunas.

According to the source, BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF ranked sixth for 2025 ETF net inflows while down 9.6% year to date, and it is the only fund in the top-25 inflow cohort posting negative returns, per Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas. Persistent inflows alongside negative performance indicate continued allocation to BTC via the ETF, a gauge traders track using Bloomberg’s daily fund flow data to assess spot demand, per Bloomberg. Net creations in IBIT require the trust to purchase BTC with cash proceeds, translating inflows into underlying spot demand that traders monitor around U.S. session prints, per the iShares Bitcoin Trust prospectus from BlackRock.

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total weekly net outflow of $497.1 million, indicating net redemptions across the cohort based on its flow dataset (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). According to Farside Investors, outflows were led by IBIT at -$240.3m, followed by BITB at -$115.1m and ARKB at -$100.7m, while FBTC posted a +$33.1m inflow (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). According to Farside Investors, GBTC saw -$27.5m and HODL -$39.2m, with BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW showing 0 flow, and BTC at -$7.4m (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). According to Farside Investors, figures are reported in US$ millions and the full breakdown is available at farside.co.uk/btc (source: Farside Investors).

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a total net outflow of $158.3 million on 2025-12-19, led by iShares IBIT at -$173.6 million and offset by Fidelity FBTC at +$15.3 million, while BITB, ARKB, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC were reported at $0. Source: @FarsideUK. Because IBIT processes creations and redemptions in cash, net outflows generally require the trust to sell bitcoin to meet redemptions, adding near-term supply to spot markets. Source: SEC iShares Bitcoin Trust prospectus. IBIT orders are keyed to end-of-day NAV with a 3:59 pm ET order cutoff and 4:00 pm ET NAV timing, concentrating primary-market flow around the U.S. equity close, a key liquidity window traders monitor for BTC execution. Source: SEC iShares Bitcoin Trust prospectus.

According to @EricBalchunas, IBIT is the only ETF on the 2025 Flow Leaderboard with a negative year-to-date return (YTD), highlighting it as an outlier on performance versus peers (source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 19, 2025). He reports that despite the negative return, IBIT still placed 6th by net inflows for the year, underscoring strong investor demand (source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 19, 2025). He adds that IBIT attracted more money than GLD in 2025 flows, indicating robust allocation to spot Bitcoin exposure via ETFs (source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 19, 2025). Balchunas characterizes this pattern as HODL-style behavior from traditional investors, which he presents as the key takeaway for BTC-linked ETF flows (source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 19, 2025).