According to @OnchainLens, an Ethereum ICO participant has moved 2,000 ETH valued at $5.85 million after 10.4 years of dormancy (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the participant originally invested $620 during the Ethereum ICO, implying a 9,438x return on cost (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the on-chain address is 0x34958a46D30e30B273ecc6E5D358A212e5307e8C, allowing market participants to monitor any subsequent transfers (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the update did not specify whether the moved ETH was sent to an exchange or another self-custody wallet, so the transfer destination is not disclosed (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address cluster described as the “1011 post-crash short opener” deposited a combined 10,000 ETH to Binance via two wallets about 15 minutes ago, with one wallet shown as 0x99E1E710fAf2EA090E5cFA5A600c1478031640be; the reference is provided via Arkham Intelligence’s explorer. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence. Such inflows to a centralized exchange increase on-exchange supply from those wallets and can introduce short-term sell-side liquidity risk if the coins reach the order book, which is relevant for ETH spot and perp traders. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence. Traders can monitor Binance ETH spot netflow, order book ask-wall formation, and perp funding/open interest today to gauge whether this deposit translates into active selling. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Binance market data.

According to @OnchainLens, the entity labeled Bitcoin OG 10 of 11 deposited 100,000 ETH worth 292.12 million dollars into Binance, source: intel.arkm.com explorer address 0x99E1E710fAf2EA090E5cFA5A600c1478031640be and @OnchainLens. The same entity is still holding ETH, BTC with 5x leverage and SOL with 20x leverage with an unrealized loss of 55 million dollars, source: app.coinmarketman.com Hypertracker wallet 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae and @OnchainLens.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet pension-usdt.eth trimmed 5,180.87 ETH about five hours earlier for a realized profit of $230,000, then rebuilt its Hyperliquid ETH long back to 30,000 ETH, remaining a Top-3 ETH long on the venue. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Dec 23, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902 The wallet reduced between $3002.6–$3019 and re-added between $2954–$2964, reflecting active T-style execution bands. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Dec 23, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902 Current position value is $88.9 million with an average entry of $2,967.88 and an unrealized loss of $128,000; account cumulative profit totals $25.13 million. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Dec 23, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902 Over the past month on Hyperliquid, the address reportedly earned $24.04 million with 16 wins in 17 trades in December for a 94.1% win rate, and nine hours earlier closed a BTC long for a $1.258 million profit; another update listed 30,000 ETH held worth $89.72 million at an average entry of $2,969.6, sustaining Top-3 ETH long status. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Dec 23, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an ETH whale withdrew 3,365.5 ETH (about $10.2M) from Bybit and OKX 7 hours ago, after accumulating 30,210 ETH between Dec 5–12 at an average price of $3,167 for a total of $95.67M, based on the linked Arkham entity; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the primary wallet 0xce9…57c69 has 29,103.1 ETH staked across Spark and Aave and has borrowed 41.12M USDT, consistent with a leveraged loop-long setup; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, an additional update notes that during Dec 5–15 the entity withdrew 21,850.15 ETH at a $3,231 average, with an unrealized loss of $6.246M, and the latest transfer was 2,000 ETH (~$5.84M) 6 hours ago; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the holdings are spread across 5 wallets, with wallet 0xce9…57c69 showing 18,706.9 ETH as collateral, $31.34M USDT debt, and a health factor of 1.41 on Aave/Spark, indicating ongoing leveraged positioning that traders may track for potential on-chain risk signals; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a long-dormant ETH address staked 3,598 ETH (about $10.8M) into Ether.fi roughly 4 hours ago, with the funds inactive for about 9 years; address and transaction trail: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xccc2458b11159E217e19354a32f3390C6837C6Fd, author post: twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/2002946365966676021. On-chain records show the stake originated from address 0xccc2458b11159E217e19354a32f3390C6837C6Fd to Ether.fi, confirming size, timing, and destination; source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xccc2458b11159E217e19354a32f3390C6837C6Fd. For trading context, this moves 3,598 ETH from long-term idle status into a staking contract rather than to exchanges, an observable supply flow that traders monitor during ETH volatility; sources: twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/2002946365966676021 and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xccc2458b11159E217e19354a32f3390C6837C6Fd.

According to @lookonchain, an Ethereum ICO wallet beginning with 0xbDb6 transferred its entire 2,000 ETH (about $5.96M) to a new wallet after more than 10 years of inactivity, with the movement evidenced by the referenced Etherscan address (source: @lookonchain; Etherscan). According to @lookonchain, the wallet originally contributed $620 in the Ethereum ICO and received 2,000 ETH, now worth approximately $5.96M, marking a 9,616x return (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the stated $5.96M value over 2,000 ETH implies an effective ETH price of roughly $2,980 at the time of the alert (source: @lookonchain).

According to @OnchainLens, a single wallet bought 2,249 ETH worth $6.54M on HyperLiquid and Lighter while increasing a 20x leveraged ETH short on both platforms; source: https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2001920618342805886. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet accumulated a total of 4,599 ETH ($13.2M) over the past 24 hours, with transactions and positions visible on the public trader dashboards; sources: https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2001920618342805886, https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xed41a12ea862F31dF054e9bD3Af1DD59486c6029, https://www.lighterpulse.xyz/dashboard/0xed41a12ea862F31dF054e9bD3Af1DD59486c6029. According to @OnchainLens, an earlier update showed the same wallet bought 3,650 ETH ($10.35M) and opened 20x ETH shorts on both platforms; sources: https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2001635711750189076, https://app.coinmarketman.com/hypertracker/wallet/0xed41a12ea862F31dF054e9bD3Af1DD59486c6029. The wallet address 0xed41a12ea862F31dF054e9bD3Af1DD59486c6029 can be viewed for verification on Arkham Intel; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xed41a12ea862f31df054e9bd3af1dd59486c6029.

According to @lookonchain, the trader labeled BitcoinOG (1011short) added 12,406 ETH to long positions and now holds 203,341 ETH valued at roughly 577.5M USD, 1,000 BTC valued at about 87M USD, and 250,000 SOL valued at about 30.7M USD, with all figures sourced from the linked Hyperdash trader page at legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. According to @lookonchain, the account’s unrealized performance is now down over 70M USD and has moved from more than 120M USD in profits to under 30M USD, per the same sources above. Based on the notional values reported by @lookonchain, ETH exposure represents approximately 83% of the wallet’s aggregate reported notional, indicating concentrated long risk in ETH relative to BTC and SOL, as derived from the cited figures.

According to @lookonchain, whale 0xc8D4 fully exited another 7,654 ETH worth about $21.62M from three additional wallets roughly 40 minutes ago, realizing around $4M profit; source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2001510885760905372 and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xC2b85cc329390D9Eba4dBa3D5765B396EE38b18D. Four hours earlier, the same entity exited 10,169 ETH worth about $29.7M; source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2001285340305519036 and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xc8D45CC670c6485F70528976D65f7603160Be2CD. Combined, the two tranches total 17,823 ETH valued at about $51.32M within ~4 hours, with implied average sale prices near $2,828 per ETH and $2,919 per ETH respectively based on the USD figures reported; source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2001510885760905372 and x.com/lookonchain/status/2001285340305519036. Lookonchain also reports the whale has generated $11.36M in cumulative profit trading ETH over the past three years; source: x.com/lookonchain/status/2001285340305519036.

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin OG address moved 614,468 ETH worth about $1.8B into nine wallets, as shown on Arkham Intelligence’s entity page and cited in the post by @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens and CoinMarketMan HyperTracker, the same OG is still holding ETH, BTC, and SOL long positions on HyperLiquid valued at roughly $694M with an unrealized loss exceeding $37M. According to Arkham Intelligence and CoinMarketMan HyperTracker, the entity’s wallet flows and HyperLiquid position PnL can be monitored in real time for changes in size and performance.

According to @lookonchain, the whale trader BitcoinOG 1011short transferred 368,106 ETH valued at about $1.08B to five newly created wallets, with transaction details linked via Arkham Intelligence. According to the Hyperliquid legacy dashboard cited by @lookonchain, the same entity holds over $680M in long exposure across BTC, ETH, and SOL. According to @lookonchain, the ETH outflow was split across five fresh addresses identifiable on the Arkham Intelligence entity page.

According to Onchain Lens, whale address 0xc8D45CC670c6485F70528976D65f7603160Be2CD deposited 10,169 ETH, valued at $29.77M, to Binance after a staking cycle, with a reported profit of $11.36M (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen). The address previously withdrew 19,505.5 ETH ($48.69M) to stake and later re-deposited 20,269 ETH ($60.05M), accruing 763.58 ETH in staking rewards over the period (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen). This latest 10,169 ETH exchange inflow increases available sell-side liquidity on a centralized exchange order book that on-chain trackers monitor for potential impact on short-term ETH market depth and flow dynamics (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale staked 25,000 ETH valued at USD 79.48 million on Dec 11, 2025 (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, these ETH had been withdrawn for USD 84.81 million from Kraken roughly one month earlier (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the staking activity is linked to addresses 0xfe31320faf8da1492eadf8deb79bd264d7cf2141 and 0x392a1e5ccfa7667d40edc49ae9462739139701e2 for on-chain verification (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, this converts previously withdrawn ETH into staked ETH, categorized as staking inflow rather than exchange balance in on-chain analytics (data: Nansen).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an associated address of wallet 0xDDf725D2...Dfb8CE5 deposited 1,880 ETH to an exchange at USD 3,117.65 per ETH, flagged as a possible sell but unconfirmed; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xDDf725D2EbD795748DD8c6b700b7c98d1Dfb8CE5. About four hours before the post, the cluster withdrew 2,779.8 ETH from Binance at USD 3,208.02 per ETH, totaling roughly USD 8.91 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa. This sequence lifts the observed cost basis by about USD 90 per ETH and implies a net exchange outflow of approximately 899.8 ETH over the window, based on the reported sizes and prices; source: calculation based on @ai_9684xtpa figures. Intent remains uncertain, as the initial deposit may not have been sold, so traders should treat the flow as directional only when corroborated by further on-chain traces; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer.

According to @lookonchain, trader 0xa43d opened an ETH long near the local peak 14 hours ago and is down $3.24 million over that period, source: @lookonchain on X. @lookonchain reports the trader partially closed the position 3 hours ago, realizing a $583.5K loss, source: @lookonchain on X. The address still holds 11,793 ETH long valued at $37.6 million with $2.66 million in unrealized losses, and the position metrics are viewable on the Hyperdash trader page, source: @lookonchain on X; source: Hyperdash. The source flags this as FOMO-driven long exposure at local highs, underscoring elevated risk for levered entries at peaks, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @lookonchain, the wallet labeled #BitcoinOG (1011short) closed 4,513 ETH worth $14.06M for a realized profit of $305K, while still holding a 50,001 ETH long valued at $155.7M with $3.4M in unrealized gains, based on on-chain and platform data shared on X; source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, earlier the same wallet had deposited a total of $70M USDC into Hyperliquid and scaled its ETH long to 54,277 ETH ($166.4M), with a reported liquidation price of $1,795.3 for the position; source: @lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin OG (10/11) has deposited an additional $60M in USDC (bringing total deposits to $70M) into HyperLiquid and increased a 5x ETH long now valued at about $165M, consisting of 54,277.33 ETH with an average entry of $3,048.31 and a liquidation price at $1,795.26. According to @OnchainLens, the trader has a resting order to further add at $3,000 on HyperLiquid. According to @OnchainLens, these reported levels ($3,000 bid, $3,048.31 entry, $1,795.26 liquidation) provide concrete reference points for ETH traders tracking large on-chain perp positions. According to @OnchainLens, cumulative USDC deposits of $70M represent posted margin available for managing the position on HyperLiquid.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH rebounded above $3,000 while the trader dubbed the post-10/11 flash crash short insider increased long exposure to 14,227 ETH (over $42.95M) with an average entry of $2,965.73 and about $762K unrealized profit; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. The position and PnL are attributed to address 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae and can be tracked in real time on HyperBot; source: hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 spent $60.7M USDC to acquire 24,000 ETH at an average entry of $2,529 about five months ago, based on on-chain records. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690; ARKM Intel address explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 According to @lookonchain, the position’s unrealized profit peaked above $55M but now stands at $14.4M, implying roughly a 23.7% ROI and an estimated mark-to-market value near $75.1M based on these figures. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690 According to @lookonchain, two hours before the post the whale staked the entire 24,000 ETH balance. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690; ARKM Intel address explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 According to @lookonchain, the prior peak gain equated to about a 90.6% return on the $60.7M cost basis, underscoring the drawdown from the top. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690