According to Santiment, on-chain data reveals significant network growth among cryptocurrencies with market caps exceeding $500M. Leading the growth surge is ASTER with an 857% increase in new wallets created. Other notable mentions include DAI on Polygon (+465%) and USDG (+444%). Non-stablecoins like ASTER and ICP show potential for price jumps following these network growth spikes, highlighting their trading prospects.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four blockchain addresses, suspected to belong to the same whale or entity, have sold 395.25 WBTC valued at $26.54 million over the past 4 hours. The transactions were executed via Cowswap at an average price of $67,156 per WBTC. The wallets have now completely liquidated their WBTC holdings and converted them into DAI. This significant movement could signal a strategic market play or portfolio reallocation.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain transaction revealed that a wallet holder liquidated 115.6 WBTC, incurring a loss of $4.48 million. The WBTC was purchased at a cost of $105,431 per token and sold at $67,070 per token. The sale converted the WBTC into 7.753 million DAI.

According to @lookonchain, Sillytuna faced a violent extortion resulting in the theft of $23.6M in aEthUSDC. The attacker has converted the majority of the stolen funds into $20.34M DAI. A smaller portion is being bridged to Arbitrum and deposited into Hyperliquid for purchasing XMR. This incident highlights critical risks in DeFi protocols and emphasizes the importance of securing digital assets.

According to OnchainLens, a significant crypto theft occurred where @sillytuna lost approximately $24 million, including funds in ETH and DAI. Some of the stolen assets have been bridged, leaving $20.44 million in DAI still held in two wallets. The situation highlights ongoing risks in crypto asset security.

According to PeckShieldAlert, a wallet associated with @sillytuna (address 0xd2e8...ca41) was drained of approximately $24 million in $aEthUSDC tokens due to an address poisoning attack. Around $20 million in $DAI tokens remains in two attacker-controlled staging wallets, each holding roughly $10 million. The attacker has initiated the process of bridging small amounts of funds to Arbitrum, signaling potential laundering activities.

According to @lookonchain, the UXLINK exploiter recently spent 10.88 million DAI to purchase 5,493 ETH at a price of $1,981 per ETH. Additionally, on January 30, the exploiter invested 16.87 million DAI to acquire 203 WBTC worth $13.31 million at the time, which has since decreased in value by $3.56 million. These movements highlight significant trading activity and potential losses in the exploiter's portfolio.

According to @EmberCN, a hacker who stole 49.5 million USDC from Infini in February last year has demonstrated advanced trading skills. The hacker converted stolen USDC to ETH, sold ETH for DAI at an average price of $3,762 in August, and recently bought back ETH with DAI at $2,109 per ETH. The hacker then laundered 15,470 ETH, worth approximately $32.58 million, through Tornado Cash.

According to @EmberCN, a whale holding an ETH-collateralized loan on Spark began stop-loss selling around $2,050 and sold 27,800 ETH to repay about $44.14 million in U stablecoin debt. According to @EmberCN, after the unwind the position still holds 9,810 ETH (about $18.66 million) on Spark with $12.83 million in DAI debt, and the liquidation price has moved down from $1,800 to $1,560.

According to @EmberCN, a large ETH borrower on Spark Protocol has 23,800 ETH posted as collateral against 35.27M DAI, with a liquidation level near 1,800 USD; as ETH moved toward 2,000 USD, the wallet began cutting exposure when the gap narrowed to about 250 USD to avoid liquidation (source: @EmberCN on X). For short term traders, the update highlights on-chain leverage concentration and liquidation risk bands around ETH on Spark, making DeFi lending flows a key watch (source: @EmberCN on X).

According to the source, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says crypto needs better decentralized stablecoins, consistent with his prior guidance that resilient designs should withstand extreme market conditions and avoid heavy reliance on centralized collateral, source: Vitalik Buterin blog at vitalik.ca, Two thought experiments to evaluate automated stablecoins. For trading, monitor market share and supply shifts between centralized stables USDT and USDC and decentralized alternatives DAI, FRAX, LUSD and RAI to gauge on-chain risk appetite and potential ETH fee demand, source: DefiLlama Stablecoins dashboard; Ethereum.org DeFi resources. For DAI, track Peg Stability Module usage and Real-World Asset collateral that increase or reduce USDC dependence, which can affect decentralization risk and MKR policy decisions, source: MakerDAO documentation; MakerDAO governance forum. For FRAX, watch the collateralization ratio, Algorithmic Market Operations and sFRAX yield settings that influence FRAX supply growth and veFXS incentives, source: Frax Finance documentation; Frax governance. For LUSD, focus on ETH-only collateral health, Stability Pool utilization, and redemption dynamics that support the USD peg without centralized assets, source: Liquity protocol documentation. Governance tokens tied to these systems MKR, FXS and LQTY can react to parameter changes that impact fee capture and risk, so track on-chain proposals and execution, source: MakerDAO governance portal; Frax governance; Liquity documentation.

According to @PeckShieldAlert, a UXLink exploiter-labeled address swapped 248 WBTC for 23 million DAI within the last hour. According to @PeckShieldAlert, this activity follows the Sept. 22 incident in which the attacker minted billions of unauthorized tokens and drained tens of millions in crypto assets. According to @PeckShieldAlert, the conversion highlights ongoing post-hack fund movement tied to UXLink-labeled addresses.

According to @OnchainLens, a tracked whale spent $10M DAI to buy 3,297 ETH at an average price of about $3,035, with activity tied to addresses 0x0741c7e02d097383861a2c8b9bf7593503b9b748 and 0x489defef6d8ea607a52249e0a345476f54090f74, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, the same entity previously bought 2,640 ETH for $10.79M and later sold for $10M, realizing a $790K loss, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, after the latest purchase the wallet’s ETH balance increased by 657 ETH, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, this places a sizable on-chain buy around the $3,035 level that traders can use as a reference for recent spot demand, citing Nansen data.

According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), wallet 0x73781209F3B0f195D0D3fA9D6b95bB61c54c1ca6 spent an additional $12.82M DAI to acquire 4,234 ETH. According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), the whale’s cumulative purchases now total 5,343 ETH for $16.08M DAI at an average price of $3,010. According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), the address still holds $55M DAI, a sizable on-chain stablecoin balance traders track for potential flow signals.

According to Onchain Lens, a previously dormant whale spent $3.25M DAI to buy 1,110 ETH at an average price of $2,933 after three months of inactivity, citing Nansen on-chain data. According to Onchain Lens, the same wallet earlier sold 15,575 ETH for $66.52M at a price of $4,270, based on Nansen data. According to Onchain Lens, the wallet still holds $67.8M DAI to buy more ETH, per Nansen data, marking $2,933 (recent accumulation) and $4,270 (prior distribution) as key reference levels for traders.

According to @PeckShieldAlert, a whale address 0xceef...ba42 that supplied WBTC on Compound to borrow USDT and DAI was liquidated for 6.67 million dollars as BTC fell below 100K dollars, source: PeckShieldAlert on X, Nov 14, 2025. The structure reflected a leveraged long on WBTC by borrowing stablecoins against WBTC collateral, and the drop in collateral value triggered liquidation, source: PeckShieldAlert on X, Nov 14, 2025 and Compound Finance documentation. On Compound, liquidation occurs when an account health factor falls below the liquidation threshold, enabling liquidators to repay debt and seize collateral with an incentive, which explains the execution of this 6.67 million dollar unwind, source: Compound Finance documentation. The size of this liquidation signals immediate on-chain deleveraging in WBTC-linked positions at the time of the BTC price drop, source: PeckShieldAlert on X, Nov 14, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, the address at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7e37daE8099E791C1a996b86f6c938A97a55E2bD sold 4,978 ETH for 16.294 million DAI at an execution price of $3,273 roughly seven hours before the post, after withdrawing these funds from Tornado Cash on Nov 8; source: @EmberCN, Arkham Intel. According to @EmberCN, the same address is suspected to be linked to Richard Heart and had previously deposited 154,000 ETH (reported as $611 million) into Tornado Cash on Nov 5; source: @EmberCN.

According to @EmberCN, an unidentified group sold 7,066 ETH on-chain for 23.945 million DAI about four hours before the post, at an average execution price of $3,389 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the ETH were withdrawn over the prior two days from Bitget and HTX using dozens of wallets, roughly 150 ETH per withdrawal, before being consolidated to five wallets for sale (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the consolidation and sale addresses are 0x1d1468A8C4631E247119F3C5879E9c19Bd2A549A, 0xE11fDF9F4224AAc4415Bb8984870c545b6b3CEcc, 0x1C95f775bcEc41d171e74681ce3a88ac90487295, 0x0E46CFb8BFe2c33b9c1DC0a29905693c09ba1F1E, and 0xDd33FB44a471e0204BD279b7e8aB90776c28bF92 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the group used multi-wallet transfers in what was described as an attempt to avoid detection before selling (source: @EmberCN).

According to @EmberCN, a wallet identified as the Radiant Capital hacker bought 1,482 ETH using 5.836M DAI about one hour ago at an average price of $3,938. Source: @EmberCN. According to Arkham Intelligence, on-chain records for address 0x0fa503e444C856b8B1b47c7f3ED590F2e748eF9e show the relevant transfers, providing verifiable evidence of the ETH acquisition and DAI outflow at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x0fa503e444C856b8B1b47c7f3ED590F2e748eF9e. Source: Arkham Intelligence. According to @EmberCN, the same address has repeatedly profited from ETH swing trades, which heightens trader attention to potential short-term market impact from this buy. Source: @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, the author also questioned whether the timing is a bet on the upcoming US–China leaders meeting as a potential catalyst rather than a confirmed driver. Source: @EmberCN. According to Arkham Intelligence, traders can monitor subsequent movements from this address via the Arkham page to gauge any follow-up flows that could affect near-term ETH order flow. Source: Arkham Intelligence.

According to @PeckShieldAlert on X dated Oct 23, 2025, the Radiant Capital exploiter swapped about 16 million DAI for 4,345.6 ETH in two batches comprising 1,511 WETH and 2,834 ETH, providing a clear on-chain record of stablecoin-to-ETH conversion relevant for traders tracking ETH flows for risk management, source: @PeckShieldAlert on X, Oct 23, 2025. According to @PeckShieldAlert on X dated Oct 23, 2025, the same address subsequently deposited 2,834.6 ETH into Tornado Cash, a movement flagged by the source as an on-chain alert that traders can monitor for further flow analysis, source: @PeckShieldAlert on X, Oct 23, 2025.