According to Bubblemaps, 68 wallets were funded via ChangeNow just before the ATLAS launch. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 28, 2025. These wallets had no prior on-chain activity, were funded in tight time windows with similar amounts of ETH, and sniped ATLAS at launch. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 28, 2025. Bubblemaps reports these 68 wallets now hold 47% of the ATLAS supply valued around 1 million dollars, highlighting a highly concentrated holder base that traders often monitor. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 28, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, WhaleInsider promoted a heavily bundled memecoin to its 600k followers, source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 28, 2025. The post specifies the token is $ATLAS, inspired by Vice President JD Vance’s pet dog, and states it is up 100% over the past 24 hours as reported by WhaleInsider, source: WhaleInsider on X, Dec 28, 2025; cited by Bubblemaps.

According to @bubblemaps, AAVE is down roughly 20% since mid-December and the situation remains ongoing, highlighting immediate price weakness in the DeFi lending token (source: @bubblemaps). The account referenced recent governance drama and publicly questioned whether ParaFi is selling and whether venture capital confidence is eroding, signaling governance risk that traders are watching (source: @bubblemaps).

According to @bubblemaps, a live case on the Bubblemaps Intel Desk is tracking an AAVE governance dispute, source: Bubblemaps on X Dec 27, 2025 and intel.bubblemaps.io/cases/85/aave-governance-dispute. The post states that users can vote with BMT to push the case into the spotlight on the Intel Desk, source: Bubblemaps on X Dec 27, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, ParaFi transferred approximately 30 million dollars worth of AAVE to Coinbase, representing about 1 percent of AAVE’s supply, source: Bubblemaps. According to @bubblemaps, the transfer took place during what it describes as Aave’s biggest crisis, source: Bubblemaps. According to @bubblemaps, the size and timing of the transfer were highlighted to underscore the scale of the move into a centralized exchange, source: Bubblemaps.

According to @bubblemaps, on Dec 26 wallet 0x0e24 transferred about $27 million in AAVE to a Coinbase deposit address, and that deposit is shared with 0x1AC6, which Bubblemaps attributes as owned and funded by ParaFi Capital; sources: Bubblemaps X post https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2004982484505919729 and Bubblemaps on-chain map https://v2.bubblemaps.io/map/kPxZmOeUUVmU3RyzyTVk. Traders can track subsequent movements from the Coinbase-linked deposit and the ParaFi-attributed 0x1AC6 cluster via the same Bubblemaps map to assess short-term exchange supply for AAVE; source: Bubblemaps on-chain map https://v2.bubblemaps.io/map/kPxZmOeUUVmU3RyzyTVk.

According to @bubblemaps, tensions between the Aave DAO and Aave Labs escalated this week into a dispute over control of the protocol’s intellectual property, code, and brand, and the fight remains unresolved, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2004982464230695405. For AAVE traders, the unresolved status leaves the control of key assets such as IP, code, and brand in question, which keeps governance outcomes uncertain until an official resolution is communicated, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2004982464230695405. Traders should monitor official communications from Aave DAO and Aave Labs for updates on the dispute and any decisions affecting protocol IP, codebase stewardship, or brand ownership that could influence AAVE’s governance profile, Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2004982464230695405.

According to @bubblemaps, $LIBRA was created by the same team behind MELANIA and other short-lived coins, supported by new on-chain evidence published in a Dec 23, 2025 X thread with Coffeezilla (source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 23, 2025). The thread alleges on-chain links between LIBRA and MELANIA token activity indicating shared creators, urging market participants to review the evidence directly (source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 23, 2025). Traders seeking to manage risk can review wallets highlighted in the thread, top-holder concentrations, and liquidity conditions around LIBRA and MELANIA in light of these allegations (source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 23, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, Trump Media bought about $40 million worth of BTC as 450 BTC were moved from exchanges into wallets identified as belonging to the company, marking its first BTC purchase in three months. Source: Bubblemaps. Exchange outflows are commonly associated with accumulation and reduced immediate sell-side supply in on-chain research, a signal closely watched by traders after large corporate buys. Source: Glassnode.

According to @bubblemaps, Trump Media, the US company behind Truth Social and majority owned by the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, received a total of 450 BTC into public wallets on Dec 22, 2025 via three transactions routed from Crypto.com, source: Bubblemaps on X; on-chain transaction data: mempool.space/tx/09473aa32e2b95a181955e432deaf4151b2d0098d1e0a216f623bf2bdc6dbbb5 mempool.space/tx/9195d97a3bb022eff98c899ee9464998a37d2d19ad2a74ecd6855e600266d61a mempool.space/tx/071bbd7ab2fb773fc1b50d82e73add4ab0a05afaef304e880478d1acb32dc662. According to @bubblemaps, the three on-chain transfers total 450 BTC and are attributed to Trump Media wallets, offering verifiable whale-sized inflow that traders can track for any subsequent address movements, source: Bubblemaps on X; on-chain proof: the three mempool.space transaction links.

According to @bubblemaps, Justin Sun remains blacklisted by WLFI, and the value of his locked tokens fell by about 60 million USD over the last three months. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183 For traders, the continued blacklist and sharp locked-asset drawdown signal ongoing headline and liquidity risk around WLFI-related exposure and wallets linked to Sun. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183 Monitor WLFI updates and on-chain changes to Sun-linked addresses for any status shift that could alter market flows. Source: @bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2003073105049338183

According to Bubblemaps, a wallet they label the Hyperliquid whale sent about $500 million in BTC to Binance in a recent update, source: Bubblemaps, X post on Dec 18, 2025, https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/2001734068199919880. Bubblemaps also states this entity, described as a 10/10 BTC shorter, opened roughly $616 million in longs across BTC, ETH, and SOL and previously moved $500 million in BTC to a fresh wallet, source: Bubblemaps, X posts including https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/1999440958912627031 and the Dec 18, 2025 update. Bubblemaps framed the exchange transfer with the prompt Dump incoming?, highlighting near-term risk concerns among traders, source: Bubblemaps, X post on Dec 18, 2025, https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/2001734068199919880.

According to @bubblemaps, 23 wallets, including the deployer, were freshly funded from Bitget and Binance just before launch (source: Bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723489993330919). These wallets were funded in tight time windows, received similar amounts of SOL, had no prior activity, and sniped $AVA at launch (source: Bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723489993330919; on-chain map https://v2.bubblemaps.io/map/S8JgQPfZT7bJkLmkKscb).

According to @bubblemaps, about 40% of the $AVA supply was bundled at launch and linked to the deployer via on-chain wallet clustering, indicating concentrated control at inception (source: @bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025). @bubblemaps described $AVA as an AI girlfriend token and asserted that holders lost money, underscoring launch-time insider concentration risk (source: @bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025). For traders, the reported deployer-linked bundle is a red flag for token distribution and liquidity dynamics around $AVA entries and exits (source: @bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, $AVA gained traction as one of the first 3D AI agent tokens, launching in November 2024 with backing from Holoworld AI, a Polychain portfolio company, source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, $AVA reached a fully diluted valuation of $300M by January 2025, indicating a roughly two-month climb from launch, source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, on-chain analysis shows multiple connected 'sniper' wallets and other linked wallets bought $AVA early with similar funding sources, position sizes, and timestamps, which strongly suggests coordination across clusters. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723510536966463 According to @bubblemaps, this coordination signal indicates early $AVA supply is concentrated among linked wallets, a trading-relevant factor when assessing liquidity and directional risk. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 18, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723510536966463

According to @bubblemaps, a live Intel Desk case is tracking suspicious activity at Pippin and raises the question of whether insiders will continue to hold. Source: @bubblemaps; intel.bubblemaps.io/cases/79 According to @bubblemaps, the community is encouraged to vote with $BMT to bring more attention to the case. Source: @bubblemaps According to @bubblemaps, the case remains open and $BMT voting can put it more in the spotlight. Source: @bubblemaps; intel.bubblemaps.io/cases/79

According to @bubblemaps, a cluster of 11 wallets holds 9% of the PIPPIN token supply (source: @bubblemaps, Dec 16, 2025). According to @bubblemaps, these wallets are linked through Bitget based on funding connections (source: @bubblemaps, Dec 16, 2025). According to @bubblemaps, coordinated PIPPIN outflows and funding patterns indicate the wallets are likely controlled by a single entity (source: @bubblemaps, Dec 16, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, 16 new wallets matching a prior pattern appeared, each funded within tight time windows from HTX; source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 16, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, these wallets received similar amounts of SOL and showed no prior activity before funding; source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 16, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, the wallets withdrew a large percentage of $PIPPIN from centralized exchanges (CEXs); source: Bubblemaps on X, Dec 16, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, the cluster visualization and addresses are available at v2.bubblemaps.io/map/4fjrmx0SzwNv36YaeeXJ; source: Bubblemaps map.

According to @bubblemaps, insiders now control 80% of $PIPPIN, valued at roughly $380M (source: @bubblemaps on X, Dec 16, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2000899077823934750). @bubblemaps adds that price is still pumping and questions its durability (source: @bubblemaps on X, Dec 16, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2000899077823934750). In a prior update, @bubblemaps reported $PIPPIN had pumped 1,000% while insiders controlled about half the supply worth approximately $120M (source: @bubblemaps on X, prior thread, https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/1995840702916542758).