According to God of Prompt on X, a structured Claude prompt can generate three testable, falsifiable A/B test hypotheses that specify the change, target metric, expected lift, behavioral rationale, measurement plan, and falsification criteria. As reported by the tweet’s author, the template enforces precision by requiring a primary metric plus 2–3 guardrails, and a clear outcome that would disprove the hypothesis, reducing vague goals like “improve engagement.” According to the tweet, this enables product teams to operationalize AI assistants like Claude for disciplined experimentation, accelerate test design, and align analytics with decision thresholds, creating business impact through faster iteration and clearer learnings about user behavior.

According to God of Prompt on Twitter, a 60% signup drop-off was diagnosed by feeding onboarding analytics into Claude, which returned a step-by-step audit highlighting psychological friction, A/B test ideas, and impact estimates; the prompt instructed prioritization by drop-off rate times traffic volume and to identify a removable step (as reported by the tweet linked on Feb 14, 2026). According to the original tweet, the framework analyzed each funnel step with over 20% abandonment, mapped causes like effort, unclear value, and trust gaps, and proposed targeted experiments including copy simplification, progressive profiling, social proof, and alternative authentication. For operators, this shows a concrete use case for Claude in conversion rate optimization: rapid diagnosis, quantified prioritization, and faster experiment design for onboarding flows. As reported by the tweet, the prompt template enables businesses to standardize CRO audits across products by pasting funnel steps, drop-offs, and average time per step to get ranked fixes and expected impact.