Scalability For Dummies!

By Matthew Lam   Apr 15, 2019 3 Min Read

This analysis is provided by our columinst Standard Kepler.

 

Thoughts of The Week

Scalability refers to a blockchain’s ability to handle large quantities of transactions. It is essential for the mainstream adoption of a blockchain, as (for example) a highly scalable smart contract platform enables dApps with large quantities of users and bulk trading volumes. The key metric commonly used to measure scalability is transactions per second (TPS), which is the maximum rate at which a blockchain can confirm transactions. The TPS processed by a blockchain is fundamentally determined by two key “dials” that can be turned one way or another: block size and block time.

Block size is the first dial, and it determines the maximum quantity of transactions that can be contained per block. While a larger block size makes it possible to contain more transactions in each block, it will also result in higher latency as it will take longer to propagate the larger block to the network. For example, once a block on the Bitcoin blockchain reaches a size of 20kb, it is estimated that each additional kb results in an additional 80ms required to propagate the block to the network. Pruning the size of each individual transaction (transaction size) is one way to include more transactions in a block without increasing the block size.

Block time is the second dial, and it refers to the average block creation time. In other words, how long does it take for a miner or block producer to create a block. The pace of block creation (block time) is non-fixed on Proof-of-Work blockchains, but adjusted via the mining difficulty. The pace of block creation is fixed on Delegated Proof-of-Stake blockchains.

Comparing block size and block time to a train station, the block size can be thought of as the size of departing trains, and the block time can be thought of as the frequency of departures from said station. Increasing either one will result in an increase to the total number of passengers able to depart from the station per unit time (TPS). The station platform can further represent the transaction pool (mempool), where passengers (transactions) wait to be included in the next train (block).

A shorter block time enhances the scalability of a blockchain as the frequency of transaction processing is higher. However, a shorter block time also means there are more blocks to propagate (synchronize) across the network. This in turn leads to higher bandwidth requirements, and possibly slower network communications. A shorter block time typically also leads to a higher rate of uncle blocks.

A commonly touted solution for increased scalability are sidechains. A sidechain is a blockchain running in parallel with the main blockchain. The sidechain can extend functionality through interoperable blockchain networks and allow for the transfer and synchronization of tokens between the two chains. Returning to the train station metaphor, where block size is represented by the size of trains and block time is represented by the frequency of departures, adding sidechains can be thought of as the addition of parallel train tracks with separate platforms to the train station. These separate tracks can be different from the main track, and can each carry a different type of train. Introducing sidechains can reduce congestion on the main track, and reduce the waiting time for passengers (transactions) on station platforms.

We can look at EOS for a really quick example of the above: A relatively small number of block producers (21) and relatively small block announcements using graphene technology limit latency challenges,, subsequently making possible the setting of lower block times. Block size is purposefully kept at 1MB (same as Bitcoin), as increases to block size would lead to increased latency in block propagation.

 

Chart of The Week

 

Chart of the Week-Scalability.JPG

 

Click here for the full PDF version!

 

************

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of Standard Kepler and do not necessarily reflect the view of Blockchain.News 


About the author

Matthew Lam    📧
Passionate in blockchain and crypto research!




Like this post:
Follow Us:
Recommended